Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation treatments I2, I1 and I6 gave the greatest increase in wheat grain.

A claim from Effects of Withholding Irrigation and Using Foliar Nano-Silicate Si As An Anti-Agent on Crop Yield and Nutrient Uptake · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation treatments I2, I1 and I6 gave the greatest increase in wheat grain.

Treatment
withholding irrigatione2
Outcome
graine1
Direction
greatest increasee1
Qualifier
irrigation treatments I2, I1, and I6e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a field factorial experiment on wheat was conducted to identify the growth stages affected by irrigation water scheduling and silicate application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–235
e1

“The irrigation treatments I2, I1, and I6 produced the greatest increase in grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–956
e2

“withholding irrigation at none, tillering , flowering , milk and dough stage , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–873

Title

Effects of Withholding Irrigation and Using Foliar Nano-Silicate Si As An Anti-Agent on Crop Yield and Nutrient Uptake

Mohamed Abo samrh; Ali Abdel-Salam; Tarek Eid; et al. Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor 2023. doi:10.21608/assjm.2023.321700

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-2c949ba1a89f9a824413515c0fb87e8074ddc9c31835322260ae33652422ea9c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.