Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The various yield attributing characters of ber were maximum with 50% pruning intensity.

A claim from Effect of pruning intensity on growth, yield and fruit quality characteristics of ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Gola · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The various yield attributing characters of ber were maximum with 50% pruning intensity.

Treatment
50% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
yield attributing characterse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Gola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–122
e0

“The various maximum yield attributing characters were obtained with 50% pruning intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–800

Title

Effect of pruning intensity on growth, yield and fruit quality characteristics of ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Gola

Anuj Kumar; Bhanu Pratap; Govind Vishwakarma Progressive Horticulture 2016. doi:10.5958/2249-5258.2016.00027.0

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2d83eabcc472bd1ba759c2757936c74b2eb7506fd90f3f69a4e4ce5314f009b5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.