Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Three irrigation treatments gave the highest shoot elongation and thickening percentages.

A claim from Effect of Irrigation levels on the growth and yield of olive trees (Olea europaea L. cv.Ashrasie) · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigation treatments gave the highest shoot elongation and thickening percentages.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Material
Ashrasiet0
Treatment
three irrigation treatmentse2
Outcome
shoot elongation and thickening percentagese2
Direction
highest valuese2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“olive trees (Olea europaea L. cv.Ashrasie)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–97
e2

“The highest values of shoot elongation and thickening percentages were achieved when three irrigation treatments were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1175

Title

Effect of Irrigation levels on the growth and yield of olive trees (Olea europaea L. cv.Ashrasie)

Bahram Kh. Mohammed; Ibrahim M. Noori Kirkuk University Journal-Scientific Studies 2008. doi:10.32894/kujss.2008.42075

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-2d873a80d8caa0dbc92c6d499841dda6be252f90bac1584148e578d521d12560 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

44 papers: 22 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 21 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.