Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment T7 gave maximum bulb diameter of 4.82 cm.

A claim from Response of Garlic (Allium sativum L.) to Organic Manures and Fertilizers · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T7 gave maximum bulb diameter of 4.82 cm.

Taxon
Garlic (Allium sativum L.)Allium sativumt0
Treatment
RDF 50% + FYM (120 q ha.-1) (T7)e0
Outcome
bulb diametere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.82 cme0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–38
e0

“RDF 50% + FYM (120 q ha.-1) (T7) recorded maximum plant height at 90 DAP (65.52 cm), number of leaves per plant at 90 DAP (8.06), harvest index (86.88%), bulb weight (30.93 g), bulb diameter (4.82 cm), yield per plot (10.45 kg), clove weight (1.81 g), clove diameter (12.29 mm), clove length (3.24 cm), TSS (43.13 oBrix), chlorophyll content of leaves (0.76 mg/gm/fresh wt.), sulphur content (1.36%), dry matter content (46.34%), ascorbic acid (13.88 mg/100gm) and crude protein content (18.95%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–814
e1

“rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–842

Title

Response of Garlic (Allium sativum L.) to Organic Manures and Fertilizers

Ramniwash Yadav; H.L. Bairwa; M.K. Gurjar International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.610.454

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-2e607bef2ba144af88832fe72b3c83b835550898cb7b8e279e068dc1c472c49a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

166 papers: 155 positive, 11 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.