Intervention effectmodel-written summary

French bean treated with 75% N through urea + 25% N through vermicompost + Rhizobium biofertilizer recorded the maximum number of branches per plant of 5.70.

A claim from Effect of Integrated Nitrogen Management on Growth Performance of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Var. Contendor under Temperate Conditions of Kashmir Valley · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

French bean treated with 75% N through urea + 25% N through vermicompost + Rhizobium biofertilizer recorded the maximum number of branches per plant of 5.70.

Taxon
French BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
75% N through urea + 25% N through vermicompost + biofertilizer (Rhizobium)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
number of branches per plante1
Direction
maximume1
Value
5.70e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“French Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–77
e0

“75% N through urea + 25% N through vermicompost + biofertilizer (Rhizobium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1169
e1

“maximum number of branches per plant (5.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1331

Title

Effect of Integrated Nitrogen Management on Growth Performance of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Var. Contendor under Temperate Conditions of Kashmir Valley

Rehana Jan; Tahir Ali; Nighat Mushtaq; et al. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology 2020. doi:10.9734/cjast/2019/v38i630454

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2f6b0cc968d674e768429447df1874e4b1613f949c93a2f7fc3c87514ee8e8b3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 34 positive, 4 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    French bean Rhizobium biofertilizer significantly affected growth and yield contributing characters.

    Cultivation of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) with an effective Biofertilizer for sustainable farming · 2024

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Rhizobium inoculation alone gave lower seed production than the lowest nitrogen treatment.

    Effects of Nitrogen application on snap beans production in Koibatek district Kenya · 2014 · compared with treatment with least nitrogen

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation affected common bean yield as reported.

    Positive interactions between legume intensification technologies and agronomic management: Evidence from participatory on-farm experiments · 2025

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Inoculation with Rhizobium plus 40 kg N ha-1 at 25 DAE (I+N) gave the same crop yield as plants fertilized at sowing and at 25 DAE (F).

    GROWTH AND YIELD OF COMMON BEAN AS AFFECTED BY SEED INOCULATION WITH RHIZOBIUM AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION · 2016 · compared with plants fertilized at sowing and at 25 DAE (F)

    No difference from an alternative

  5. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation with P addition did not increase seed yield beyond P alone.

    Environmental constraints to nodulation and nitrogen fixation ofPhaseolus vulgaris l. in Tanzania. II. Response to N and P fertilizersand inoculation with Rhizobium · 1998 · compared with P alone

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    Triple inoculation increased seed yield by 6.6% over control.

    EFFECTS OF SINGLE, DUAL AND TRIPLE INOCULATIONS WITHBACILLUS SUBTILIS,BACILLUS MEGATERIUMANDRHIZOBIUM LEGUMINOSARUM BV. PHASEOLION NODULATION, NUTRIENT UPTAKE, YIELD AND YIELD PARAMETERS OF COMMON BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARISL. CV. ‘ELKOCA-05’) · 2010 · compared with control

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Rhizobium HB-429 inoculation increased grain yield by 48% versus uninoculated controls.

    Grain yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties is markedly increased by rhizobial inoculation and phosphorus application in Ethiopia · 2017 · compared with uninoculated control

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Combined Rhizobium and PGPR inoculation significantly increased bean yield and yield components.

    Evaluation of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Seeds Inoculation with Rhizobium phaseoli and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Yield and Yield Components · 2008

    Same direction

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

156 papers: 131 positive, 25 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Bean yield was lowest with zero nitrate.

    GROWTH AND YIELD OF WHITE BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) IN RESPONSE TO NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZER AND TO INOCULATION WITH Rhizobium · 1987

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    N levels did not affect yield of either bean cultivar.

    BIOLOGICAL N2 FIXATION AND MINERAL N IN COMMON BEAN–MAIZE INTERCROPPING OR SOLE CROPPING IN SOUTHEASTERN BRAZIL · 2007

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Applied mineral nitrogen resulted in smaller nitrogen harvest indices in Negro Argel.

    Partitioning of nitrogen from biological fixation and fertilizer in Phaseolus vulgaris · 1987

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Application of 120 kg N ha −1 did not increase bean yield.

    RhizobiumInoculation Increases of Bean and Maize Yields in Intercrops on Farms in the Peruvian Sierra · 1994

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    The small nitrogen dose at planting thus negatively affected bean yield.

    Nitrogen and molybdenum fertilization and inoculation of common bean with Rhizobium spp. in two oxisols · 2016

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Final seed yield was not significantly affected.

    Effects of Combined Nitrogen on Nodulation and Growth of Phaseolus vulgaris · 1980

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    N management did not significantly affect the overall yield of dry bean.

    Yield Stability of Dry Bean Genotypes across Nitrogen‐Fixation‐Dependent and Fertilizer‐Dependent Management Systems · 2015

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Foliar application of 10 kg/ha nitrogen before flowering had no effect on seed yield or seed nitrogen concentration.

    Response of field beans ( Vicia faba L cv. Maris Bead) to time of sowing, plant population, nitrogen, and irrigation · 1987

    Opposite direction

147 papers more in this group

See all 156 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    French bean Rhizobium biofertilizer significantly affected growth and yield contributing characters.

    Cultivation of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) with an effective Biofertilizer for sustainable farming · 2024

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Inoculated treatments yielded significantly less than the control.

    Effects of Angular Leaf Spot and Rust on Yield Loss of Phaseolus vulgaris · 2001 · compared with control treatment

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    LCS0306 inoculation gave grain yield similar to nitrogen-fertilised controls.

    Formulation of a Highly Effective Inoculant for Common Bean Based on an Autochthonous Elite Strain of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli, and Genomic-Based Insights Into Its Agronomic Performance · 2019 · compared with nitrogen-fertilised controls

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Under BGYMV inoculation, PR9556-158 had fewer seeds per pod than PR9556-171.

    Inheritance of Normal Pod Development in Bean Golden Yellow Mosaic Resistant Common Bean · 2004 · compared with PR9556-171

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Rhizobia inoculation did not significantly increase seed yields or reduce the response to N fertilizer.

    Fertilizer responses of dry bean in southern Alberta · 2001

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation under full N did not raise biomass or pod yield.

    Impact of rhizobial inoculation and reduced N supply on biomass production and biological N2 fixation in common bean grown hydroponically · 2017 · compared with non‐inoculation

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Inoculated common bean cultivars showed reductions in pod number, grain number, and grain mass.

    Charcoal rot severity and yield components of common bean cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Inoculation had no effect on yield.

    Field Trials with Canadian Wonder Beans in Malawi · 1973

    Opposite direction

186 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.