Claim · model-written summary
B treatment did not affect growth of Aconhi-89.
- Taxon
- Durum Wheat
Triticum turgidum subsp. durumt0 - Material
- Aconhi-89e0
- Treatment
- B treatmente0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the growth of the genotypes Sabil-1, Stn "S", Aconhi-89 and Wadelmez-2 was not affected; even, there was a tendency for an increase in growth by B treatment”
t0“Durum Wheat Genotypes”
Title
Genotypic Variation in Tolerance to Boron Toxicity in 70 Durum Wheat Genotypes
Ayfer Alkan Torun; Atilla Yazıcı; Halil Erdem; et al. Sabanci University 2006
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Observation Boron toxicity caused large genotypic variation in leaf symptoms and dry matter loss.
- Intervention effect B treatment did not affect growth of Sabil-1.
- Intervention effect B treatment did not affect growth of Stn S.
- Intervention effect B treatment did not affect growth of Wadelmez-2.
- Intervention effect Applied B markedly decreased dry matter production in Lagost-3.
- Intervention effect Applied B markedly decreased dry matter production in Dicle-74.
- Intervention effect B application reduced dry weight of Brachoua/134xS-61 twofold.
- Intervention effect B application reduced dry weight of Gerbrach twofold.
- Association Shoot B concentration was unrelated to relative dry weight loss.
- Association The most B-sensitive genotypes generally had lower shoot B than more tolerant genotypes.
- Mechanism The authors infer that B exclusion does not explain tolerance differences.
- Mechanism The authors suggest cell wall adsorption or vacuolar compartmentation may explain B tolerance.