Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation increased root biomass at 0–12 cm by 19.3%.

A claim from Model of niche-fitness of crop species and its application to the growth and yield of spring wheat · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased root biomass at 0–12 cm by 19.3%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
0~12 cme0
Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
increasee1
Value
19.3%e0
Comparator
non-irrigatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mean value of root biomass in 0~12 cm(19.3%) compared with non-irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–683
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98
e1

“irrigation resulted in the increase of the mean value of niche-fitness(18.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–553

Title

Model of niche-fitness of crop species and its application to the growth and yield of spring wheat

Zizhen Li Journal of Lanzhou University 2010

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-3514a0dbc0adc9d3cce748d890d30d7d5d17d22e03e360f0117d5528c7c8cf57 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.