Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping did not significantly reduce okra yield in either year except with IT84S 22466.
- Taxon
- Okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- Okra yielde0
- Direction
- not significantly reducede0
- Qualifier
- except in okra + IT84S 22466e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Okra yield was not significantly reduced by intercropping in both years except in okra + IT84S 22466.”
Title
J. N. Odedina; Thomas Oladeji Fabunmi; S. O. Adigbo; et al. 2014
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Observation All cowpea–okra mixtures had land equivalent ratios above one.
- Intervention effect Okra leaf area, LAI, flowers per plant and pods per plant showed no significant difference except in the IT84S 2246-6 mixture.
- Intervention effect Intercropping enhanced cowpea growth and yield relative to sole cropping.
- Observation Oloyin gave a 147% yield advantage.
- Observation IT90K 2772-2 gave a 133% yield advantage.
- Observation Sokoto gave a 92% yield advantage.