Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Micro sprinkler irrigation raised wheat grain yield 42.1% versus rain fed.

A claim from Effects of micro-sprinkler irrigation and topsoil compaction on winter wheat grain yield and water use efficiency in the Huaibei Plain, China · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micro sprinkler irrigation raised wheat grain yield 42.1% versus rain fed.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
MIe0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42.1%e0
Comparator
RFe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MI significantly increased GY compared to CI and RF, by averages of 17.9 and 42.1%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1107
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76

Title

Effects of micro-sprinkler irrigation and topsoil compaction on winter wheat grain yield and water use efficiency in the Huaibei Plain, China

Jinpeng Li; Jinpeng Li; Siqi Wang; et al. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jia.2025.02.020

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-3a864380ea1a85d43bf379d766919842a9c69c85dfa7572b28d51c3fd2ae8b90 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.