Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T11 gave the highest benefit-cost ratio, 2.12.

A claim from Response of bread wheat and nutrient removal with new micronutrient molecules fertilization · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave the highest benefit-cost ratio, 2.12.

Treatment
T11 (T1 +soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4+ Colemanite)e1
Outcome
B:C ratioe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2.12e1
Comparator
treatment T12e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–163
e1

“highest values of growth parameters, yield attributes, grain yield (4.25 t/ha), straw yield (5.89 t/ha), net returns (54870 ₹/ha) and B:C ratio (2.12) were recorded with T11 (T1 +soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4+ Colemanite) followed by treatment T12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1019

Title

Response of bread wheat and nutrient removal with new micronutrient molecules fertilization

ANAND SINGH; U P SHAHI; B P DHYANI; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.56093/ijas.v91i5.112989

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-3b3fdf3bb4b6c72df366572dcad83b8d3c9f24ee2c1568313cbc7ec2d5577de3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

etidronic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this claim · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

868 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.