Abstract
The application of NPK for crop production is not quite enough for higher and quality crop production as well as soil health so balance fertilization with combination of macro and micronutrients application is much important. Selection of suitable nutrient sources, quantity, method and time of application are equally important to get higher yield with maintaining soil quality and environment. Considering this point, a field experiment was conducted following the 4R Nutrient Stewardship to evaluate the effect of different sources of micronutrients (Zn, Mn and B) fertilizers and their mode of application along with NPK on wheat crop during rabi season of 2017–18 and 2018–19 at the Crop Research Centre, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. The maximum dry matter accumulation at each sampling interval was found with RDF + soil application of Zn HEDP+ MnSO4+ Colemanite with the highest grain (4.25 t ha-1), straw (5.89 t ha-1) and biological yield (10.14 t ha-1), followed by RDF + foliar application of Zn HEDP + EDTA Mn + DOT. The application of RDF + foliar application of Zn HEDP + EDTA Mn + DOT resulted in a highest harvest index (HI) 42.18. Organic carbon, essential factor for soil conservation was also maximum with application of RDF + soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4 + Colemanite during both years while. The foliar application of any single micronutrient with RDF improved the parameters considerably over RDF.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Soil Zn HEDP, MnSO4 and Colemanite with RDF gave maximum wheat dry matter accumulation.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- RDF + soil application of Zn HEDP+ MnSO4+ Colemanitee1
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulatione1
- Direction
- maximume1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“wheat crop”
e1“maximum dry matter accumulation at each sampling interval was found with RDF + soil application of Zn HEDP+ MnSO4+ Colemanite”
Claim · model-written summary
The same soil application gave the highest grain yield, 4.25 t ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- RDF + soil application of Zn HEDP+ MnSO4+ Colemanitee1
- Outcome
- graine1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 4.25 t ha-1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“wheat crop”
e1“RDF + soil application of Zn HEDP+ MnSO4+ Colemanite with the highest grain (4.25 t ha-1), straw (5.89 t ha-1) and biological yield (10.14 t ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
The same soil application gave the highest straw yield, 5.89 t ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- RDF + soil application of Zn HEDP+ MnSO4+ Colemanitee1
- Outcome
- strawe1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 5.89 t ha-1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“wheat crop”
e1“RDF + soil application of Zn HEDP+ MnSO4+ Colemanite with the highest grain (4.25 t ha-1), straw (5.89 t ha-1) and biological yield (10.14 t ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
The same soil application gave the highest biological yield, 10.14 t ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- RDF + soil application of Zn HEDP+ MnSO4+ Colemanitee1
- Outcome
- biological yielde1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 10.14 t ha-1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“wheat crop”
e1“RDF + soil application of Zn HEDP+ MnSO4+ Colemanite with the highest grain (4.25 t ha-1), straw (5.89 t ha-1) and biological yield (10.14 t ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar Zn HEDP, EDTA Mn and DOT with RDF gave the highest harvest index, 42.18.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- RDF + foliar application of Zn HEDP + EDTA Mn + DOTe1
- Outcome
- harvest indexe1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 42.18e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“wheat crop”
e1“RDF + foliar application of Zn HEDP + EDTA Mn + DOT resulted in a highest harvest index (HI) 42.18”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil Zn HEDP, MnSO4 and Colemanite with RDF gave maximum soil organic carbon in both years.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- RDF + soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4 + Colemanitee1
- Outcome
- Organic carbone1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Qualifier
- during both yearse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“wheat crop”
e1“Organic carbon, essential factor for soil conservation was also maximum with application of RDF + soil application of Zn HEDP + MnSO4 + Colemanite during both years”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application of any single micronutrient with RDF improved the measured parameters over RDF alone.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- foliar application of any single micronutrient with RDFe1
- Outcome
- parameterse1
- Direction
- improvede1
- Comparator
- RDFe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“wheat crop”
e1“foliar application of any single micronutrient with RDF improved the parameters considerably over RDF”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →manganese atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →etidronic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
application · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fertilization · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
210 papers more in this group
See all 214 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.