Paper · 2009 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Effectiveness of seed-soaked Cu, autumn- versus spring-applied Cu, and Cu-treated P fertilizer on seed yield of wheat and residual nitrate-N for a Cu-deficient soil

S S Malhi

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Three field experiments were conducted from 2005 to 2007 to determine the effects of seed-soaking in Cu EDTA liquid, autumn versus spring application of granular Cu sulphate, and granular Cu-treated monoammonium phosphate (MAP) fertilizer on seed yield and Cu uptake of wheat, and residual nitrate-N in the soil profile on a Cu-deficient Dark Gray Luvisol (Boralf) sandy loam near Porcupine Plain, Saskatchewan, Canada. In exp. 1, seed soaked in Cu EDTA liquid at 0.04 to 0.16 kg Cu ha -1 increased seed yield substantially, in spite of a significant reduction in plant emergence in most cases. But, seed yield increases from the seed soaked in Cu EDTA liquid were lower compared with foliar-applied Cu EDTA liquid at 0.50 to 1.00 kg Cu ha -1 , or compared with surface spray-broadcast and incorporation of Cu EDTA liquid into soil in spring prior to seeding at 4.0 kg Cu ha -1 . Seed yield trend was two foliar applications of Cu EDTA liquid > soil surface spray-broadcast and incorporated Cu EDTA liquid > one foliar application of Cu EDTA liquid > seed-soaked Cu EDTA liquid. In exp. 2, for granular Cu sulphate in the first year, only previous autumn application increased seed yield significantly when applied at 4.0 kg ha -1 . For spring application, seed yield was highest when solution Cu EDTA at 4.0 kg ha -1 was spray-broadcast on the soil surface and incorporated into soil prior to seeding. In exp. 3, application of granular Cu-treated MAP fertilizer had no significant effect on seed yield. The Cu uptake by seed usually followed`the same trends as seed yield. In all experiments, the partial factor productivity (seed yield per unit of nutrient applied) was much higher when N was applied in combination with Cu (15.3 to 29.8 kg seed kg -1 applied N ha -1 ) compared with N alone (5.7 to 7.7 kg seed kg -1 applied N ha -1 ). In exp. 1, the amounts of residual nitrate-N in the 0-90 cm soil profile after three annual N fertilizer applications were 3.3 to 4.0 times higher in the zero-Cu control than in the Cu fertilizer treatments. Overall, seed yields of wheat were highest with two foliar applications of Cu at low rates, or with soil spray/broadcast and incorporation of solution Cu in spring at a relatively high rate, which is also expected to have long-term residual effects on crop yield. For granular Cu sulphate, the results indicated that deficiency of Cu in wheat can be corrected by surface-broadcast application at a relatively high rate in the previous autumn, followed by its incorporation into soil in the spring at seeding. The results also indicate that by soaking wheat seed in Cu EDTA solution at a very low rate, Cu deficiency in wheat can be prevented and seed yield increased, but less than the other Cu treatments. Accumulation and downward movement of residual nitrate-N in the soil profile can be minimized by preventing Cu deficiency in wheat crop with combined application of Cu and N fertilizers. Key words: Application time, Cu source, foliar application, granular Cu, growth stage, placement method, rate of Cu, seed-soaked Cu, soil incorporation, solution Cu

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking in Cu EDTA increased wheat seed yield.

Treatment
seed soaked in Cu EDTA liquid at 0.04 to 0.16 kg Cu ha -1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“seed soaked in Cu EDTA liquid at 0.04 to 0.16 kg Cu ha -1 increased seed yield substantially”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking significantly reduced plant emergence in most cases.

Outcome
plant emergencee0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
in most casese0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in spite of a significant reduction in plant emergence in most cases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-soaked Cu EDTA produced smaller yield gains than foliar Cu EDTA.

Treatment
seed soaked in Cu EDTA liquide0
Outcome
seed yield increasese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
foliar-applied Cu EDTA liquid at 0.50 to 1.00 kg Cu ha -1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield increases from the seed soaked in Cu EDTA liquid were lower compared with foliar-applied Cu EDTA liquid at 0.50 to 1.00 kg Cu ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-soaked Cu EDTA produced smaller yield gains than spring soil-applied Cu EDTA.

Treatment
seed soaked in Cu EDTA liquide0
Outcome
seed yield increasese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
surface spray-broadcast and incorporation of Cu EDTA liquid into soil in spring prior to seeding at 4.0 kg Cu ha -1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield increases from the seed soaked in Cu EDTA liquid were lower compared with foliar-applied Cu EDTA liquid at 0.50 to 1.00 kg Cu ha -1 , or compared with surface spray-broadcast and incorporation of Cu EDTA liquid into soil in spring prior to seeding at 4.0 kg Cu ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only previous-autumn granular Cu sulphate at 4.0 kg per hectare significantly increased first-year yield.

Treatment
previous autumn applicatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.0 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“only previous autumn application increased seed yield significantly when applied at 4.0 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring soil spray-broadcast Cu EDTA produced the highest yield among spring applications.

Treatment
solution Cu EDTA at 4.0 kg ha -1 was spray-broadcast on the soil surface and incorporated into soil prior to seedinge0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield was highest when solution Cu EDTA at 4.0 kg ha -1 was spray-broadcast on the soil surface and incorporated into soil prior to seeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Granular Cu-treated MAP fertilizer had no significant effect on wheat seed yield.

Treatment
granular Cu-treated MAP fertilizere0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of granular Cu-treated MAP fertilizer had no significant effect on seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1504 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper uptake by seed generally followed seed yield trends.

Organ / stage
seede0
Outcome
Cu uptake by seede0
Direction
same trends as seed yielde0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The Cu uptake by seed usually followed`the same trends as seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial factor productivity was higher with combined N and Cu than N alone.

Treatment
N was applied in combination with Cue0
Outcome
partial factor productivitye0
Direction
much highere0
Value
15.3 to 29.8 kg seed kg -1 applied N ha -1e0
Qualifier
5.7 to 7.7 kg seed kg -1 applied N ha -1e0
Comparator
N alonee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“partial factor productivity (seed yield per unit of nutrient applied) was much higher when N was applied in combination with Cu (15.3 to 29.8 kg seed kg -1 applied N ha -1 ) compared with N alone (5.7 to 7.7 kg seed kg -1 applied N ha -1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil nitrate was 3.3 to 4 times higher without Cu than under Cu fertilization.

Treatment
zero-Cu controle0
Outcome
residual nitrate-Ne0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.3 to 4.0 timese0
Comparator
Cu fertilizer treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“residual nitrate-N in the 0-90 cm soil profile after three annual N fertilizer applications were 3.3 to 4.0 times higher in the zero-Cu control than in the Cu fertilizer treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1866–2047 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend previous-autumn surface-broadcast granular Cu sulphate with spring incorporation to correct Cu deficiency.

Outcome
deficiency of Cu in wheat can be correctede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficiency of Cu in wheat can be corrected by surface-broadcast application at a relatively high rate in the previous autumn, followed by its incorporation into soil in the spring at seeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2365–2556 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that low-rate Cu EDTA seed soaking can prevent Cu deficiency and increase yield.

Outcome
Cu deficiency in wheat can be prevented and seed yield increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by soaking wheat seed in Cu EDTA solution at a very low rate, Cu deficiency in wheat can be prevented and seed yield increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2588–2714 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that combined Cu and N fertilization can minimize residual nitrate accumulation and downward movement.

Outcome
Accumulation and downward movement of residual nitrate-N in the soil profile can be minimizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Accumulation and downward movement of residual nitrate-N in the soil profile can be minimized by preventing Cu deficiency in wheat crop with combined application of Cu and N fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2755–2941 · show in text ↑

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

ammonium dihydrogen phosphate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.