Abstract
Core Ideas Spring wheat did not respond to additional nutrients beside recommended nitrogen. Seed inoculation with Trichoderma spp. did not impact yield or protein. Additional P, Cu, Zn, and S did not change grain protein. Nutrient management is critical for improving spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) yield and protein content. During 2014 to 2016, field experiments were conducted to determine the potential of nutrient applications with recommended nitrogen (N) to improve wheat production near Glyndon, MN. Treatments were additions of phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn), alone or in combination, and inoculation with growth promoting bacteria ( Trichoderma spp. ) in addition to recommended nitrogen (N) fertilizer on grain yield and protein content. Growing year had a significant effect ( P < 0.05) on yield and protein content. Applications of mono ammonium phosphate (11–52–0) at the rate of 40 lb P 2 O 5 /ac and combined applications of Cu, Zn, and S increased grain yield over the recommended treatment and check, in 2015 only. There was no significant impact on grain protein content by the applied treatments. In this study, supplemental additions of nutrients did not increase spring wheat yield and protein content.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Mono ammonium phosphate at 40 lb P2O5/ac increased spring wheat grain yield over the recommended treatment and check in 2015 only.
- Taxon
- Spring Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- mono ammonium phosphate (11–52–0) at the rate of 40 lb P 2 O 5 /ace0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- in 2015 onlye0
- Comparator
- recommended treatment and checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Spring Wheat Response to Supplemental Nutrient Additions under Silty Clay Loam Soils of Minnesota”
e0“Applications of mono ammonium phosphate (11–52–0) at the rate of 40 lb P 2 O 5 /ac and combined applications of Cu, Zn, and S increased grain yield over the recommended treatment and check, in 2015 only”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined applications of Cu, Zn and S increased spring wheat grain yield over the recommended treatment and check in 2015 only.
- Taxon
- Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- combined applications of Cu, Zn, and Se0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- in 2015 onlye0
- Comparator
- recommended treatment and checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Spring Wheat Response to Supplemental Nutrient Additions under Silty Clay Loam Soils of Minnesota”
e0“Applications of mono ammonium phosphate (11–52–0) at the rate of 40 lb P 2 O 5 /ac and combined applications of Cu, Zn, and S increased grain yield over the recommended treatment and check, in 2015 only”
Claim · model-written summary
The applied nutrient treatments had no significant impact on spring wheat grain protein content.
- Taxon
- Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- applied treatmentse1
- Outcome
- grain protein contente1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Spring Wheat Response to Supplemental Nutrient Additions under Silty Clay Loam Soils of Minnesota”
e1“There was no significant impact on grain protein content by the applied treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed inoculation with Trichoderma spp. did not affect spring wheat yield or protein.
- Taxon
- Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Seed inoculation with Trichoderma spp.e2
- Interactor
- Trichoderma spp.
Trichodermae2symbiont - Outcome
- yield or proteine2
- Direction
- did not impacte2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Spring Wheat Response to Supplemental Nutrient Additions under Silty Clay Loam Soils of Minnesota”
e2“Seed inoculation with Trichoderma spp. did not impact yield or protein”
Claim · model-written summary
Growing year had a significant effect on spring wheat yield and protein content.
- Taxon
- Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- yield and protein contente3
- Setting
- Growing yeare3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Spring Wheat Response to Supplemental Nutrient Additions under Silty Clay Loam Soils of Minnesota”
e3“Growing year had a significant effect ( P < 0.05) on yield and protein content”
The same questions in other papers
copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
71 papers more in this group
See all 75 papers →zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →Trichoderma · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
ammonium dihydrogen phosphate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
inoculation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.