Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Herbicide programs other than low-rate 2,4-D reduced giant ragweed density by at least 80%.

A claim from Interaction of 2,4-D or Dicamba with Glufosinate for Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) in Glufosinate-Resistant Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide programs other than low-rate 2,4-D reduced giant ragweed density by at least 80%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Herbicide programse0
Interactor
GR giant ragweede0weed
Outcome
GR giant ragweed densitye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
≥ 80%e0
Qualifier
excluding 2,4-D at 280 g ae ha–1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide programs, excluding 2,4-D at 280 g ae ha–1, resulted in ≥ 80% reduction in GR giant ragweed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1831–1940
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–165

Title

Interaction of 2,4-D or Dicamba with Glufosinate for Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) in Glufosinate-Resistant Maize (Zea mays L.)

Zahoor A. Ganie; Amit J. Jhala Frontiers in Plant Science 2017. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01207

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-3cbc699d00ace44997356389d4f0b3abb49994027d6ac1d4a08a65da5c694ba0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

herbicide · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 30 positive, 17 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.