Abstract
Applications of both terbufos and nicosulfuron can result in a synergistic interaction that injures corn. Field studies were conducted at two Illinois locations in 1991 to determine the effect of insecticide formulation and application method on the serverity of this interaction. Terbufos, applied to the soil at planting, interacted with nicosulfuron applied postemergence to injure corn and reduce grain yield. In-furrow-applied terbufos caused a more injurious interaction to corn than terbufos placed in a surface band; the 15G formulation was more injurious than the 20CR formulation. Simulated rainfall timing experiments were conducted in 1992 and 1993 by treating corn with terbufos 15G and terbufos 20CR and applying rainfall (3.8 cm) 1, 7, or 14 d before nicosulfuron application. No visual injury or yield reductions were noted in corn treated with nicosulfuron alone. Terbufos 15G caused greater corn injury than did terbufos 20CR at each rainfall timing when sprayed with nicosulfuron. Corn injury and subsequent grain yield that can result from the interaction between nicosulfuron and terbufos was greater when simulated rainfall occurred 1 and 7 d before nicosulfuron application than when rainfall occurred 14 d before application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Terbufos and nicosulfuron together injured corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- Terbufos, applied to the soil at planting, interacted with nicosulfuron applied postemergencee0
- Outcome
- injure corne0
- Direction
- injuree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Terbufos, applied to the soil at planting, interacted with nicosulfuron applied postemergence to injure corn and reduce grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
The two chemicals reduced corn grain yield.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- Terbufos, applied to the soil at planting, interacted with nicosulfuron applied postemergencee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Terbufos, applied to the soil at planting, interacted with nicosulfuron applied postemergence to injure corn and reduce grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
In furrow terbufos caused more corn injury than surface band placement.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- In-furrow-applied terbufose0
- Outcome
- injurious interaction to corne0
- Direction
- more injuriouse0
- Comparator
- terbufos placed in a surface bande0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In-furrow-applied terbufos caused a more injurious interaction to corn than terbufos placed in a surface band”
Claim · model-written summary
Terbufos 15G was more injurious than 20CR.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- 15G formulatione0
- Outcome
- injuriouse0
- Direction
- more injuriouse0
- Comparator
- 20CR formulatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the 15G formulation was more injurious than the 20CR formulation”
t0“Corn”
t1“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Nicosulfuron alone caused no visual injury.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- nicosulfuron alonee0
- Outcome
- visual injurye0
- Direction
- Noe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No visual injury or yield reductions were noted in corn treated with nicosulfuron alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Nicosulfuron alone caused no yield reduction.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- nicosulfuron alonee0
- Outcome
- yield reductionse0
- Direction
- Noe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No visual injury or yield reductions were noted in corn treated with nicosulfuron alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Terbufos 15G caused greater injury than 20CR at every rainfall timing with nicosulfuron.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- Terbufos 15Ge0
- Outcome
- corn injurye0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- at each rainfall timing when sprayed with nicosulfurone0
- Comparator
- terbufos 20CRe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Terbufos 15G caused greater corn injury than did terbufos 20CR at each rainfall timing when sprayed with nicosulfuron”
Claim · model-written summary
Rainfall 1 and 7 days before nicosulfuron caused greater injury than rainfall 14 days before.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- simulated rainfall occurred 1 and 7 d before nicosulfuron applicatione0
- Outcome
- Corn injurye0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- rainfall occurred 14 d before applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Corn injury and subsequent grain yield that can result from the interaction between nicosulfuron and terbufos was greater when simulated rainfall occurred 1 and 7 d before nicosulfuron application than when rainfall occurred 14 d before application”
Claim · model-written summary
Rainfall 1 and 7 days before nicosulfuron gave greater grain yield than rainfall 14 days before, as worded in the abstract.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- simulated rainfall occurred 1 and 7 d before nicosulfuron applicatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- rainfall occurred 14 d before applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Corn injury and subsequent grain yield that can result from the interaction between nicosulfuron and terbufos was greater when simulated rainfall occurred 1 and 7 d before nicosulfuron application than when rainfall occurred 14 d before application”
The same questions in other papers
nicosulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →terbufos · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →nicosulfuron · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →terbufos · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →nicosulfuron · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →herbicide · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →rainfall · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
66 papers more in this group
See all 70 papers →herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 500 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
647 papers more in this group
See all 651 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.