Paper · 1995 · Weed Technology

Effect of Simulated Rainfall, Insecticide Formulation, and Insecticide Application Method on the Interaction between Nicosulfuron and Terbufos in Corn (Zea mays)

Kevin E. Diehl; Edward W. Stoller

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Applications of both terbufos and nicosulfuron can result in a synergistic interaction that injures corn. Field studies were conducted at two Illinois locations in 1991 to determine the effect of insecticide formulation and application method on the serverity of this interaction. Terbufos, applied to the soil at planting, interacted with nicosulfuron applied postemergence to injure corn and reduce grain yield. In-furrow-applied terbufos caused a more injurious interaction to corn than terbufos placed in a surface band; the 15G formulation was more injurious than the 20CR formulation. Simulated rainfall timing experiments were conducted in 1992 and 1993 by treating corn with terbufos 15G and terbufos 20CR and applying rainfall (3.8 cm) 1, 7, or 14 d before nicosulfuron application. No visual injury or yield reductions were noted in corn treated with nicosulfuron alone. Terbufos 15G caused greater corn injury than did terbufos 20CR at each rainfall timing when sprayed with nicosulfuron. Corn injury and subsequent grain yield that can result from the interaction between nicosulfuron and terbufos was greater when simulated rainfall occurred 1 and 7 d before nicosulfuron application than when rainfall occurred 14 d before application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terbufos and nicosulfuron together injured corn.

Treatment
Terbufos, applied to the soil at planting, interacted with nicosulfuron applied postemergencee0
Outcome
injure corne0
Direction
injuree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Terbufos, applied to the soil at planting, interacted with nicosulfuron applied postemergence to injure corn and reduce grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two chemicals reduced corn grain yield.

Treatment
Terbufos, applied to the soil at planting, interacted with nicosulfuron applied postemergencee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Terbufos, applied to the soil at planting, interacted with nicosulfuron applied postemergence to injure corn and reduce grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In furrow terbufos caused more corn injury than surface band placement.

Treatment
In-furrow-applied terbufose0
Outcome
injurious interaction to corne0
Direction
more injuriouse0
Comparator
terbufos placed in a surface bande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In-furrow-applied terbufos caused a more injurious interaction to corn than terbufos placed in a surface band”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terbufos 15G was more injurious than 20CR.

Treatment
15G formulatione0
Outcome
injuriouse0
Direction
more injuriouse0
Comparator
20CR formulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 15G formulation was more injurious than the 20CR formulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–150 · show in text ↑
t1

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicosulfuron alone caused no visual injury.

Treatment
nicosulfuron alonee0
Outcome
visual injurye0
Direction
Noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No visual injury or yield reductions were noted in corn treated with nicosulfuron alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicosulfuron alone caused no yield reduction.

Treatment
nicosulfuron alonee0
Outcome
yield reductionse0
Direction
Noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No visual injury or yield reductions were noted in corn treated with nicosulfuron alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terbufos 15G caused greater injury than 20CR at every rainfall timing with nicosulfuron.

Treatment
Terbufos 15Ge0
Outcome
corn injurye0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
at each rainfall timing when sprayed with nicosulfurone0
Comparator
terbufos 20CRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Terbufos 15G caused greater corn injury than did terbufos 20CR at each rainfall timing when sprayed with nicosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall 1 and 7 days before nicosulfuron caused greater injury than rainfall 14 days before.

Treatment
simulated rainfall occurred 1 and 7 d before nicosulfuron applicatione0
Outcome
Corn injurye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
rainfall occurred 14 d before applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn injury and subsequent grain yield that can result from the interaction between nicosulfuron and terbufos was greater when simulated rainfall occurred 1 and 7 d before nicosulfuron application than when rainfall occurred 14 d before application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall 1 and 7 days before nicosulfuron gave greater grain yield than rainfall 14 days before, as worded in the abstract.

Treatment
simulated rainfall occurred 1 and 7 d before nicosulfuron applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
rainfall occurred 14 d before applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn injury and subsequent grain yield that can result from the interaction between nicosulfuron and terbufos was greater when simulated rainfall occurred 1 and 7 d before nicosulfuron application than when rainfall occurred 14 d before application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1248 · show in text ↑

nicosulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

59 papers: 40 positive, 19 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

terbufos · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nicosulfuron · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

terbufos · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nicosulfuron · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 6 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

herbicide · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 30 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

rainfall · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 34 positive, 36 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 500 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.