Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional furrow irrigation significantly improved yield, nutrient uptake and consumptive use in the potato-maize system.

A claim from Crop water use, nutrient content and uptake as influenced by irrigation and nitrogen management in potato (Solanum tuberosum) – maize (Zea mays) cropping system · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional furrow irrigation significantly improved yield, nutrient uptake and consumptive use in the potato-maize system.

Taxon
potato (Solanum tuberosum) – maize (Zea mays)Solanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
conventional furrow irrigatione0
Outcome
yield, nutrients uptakee0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant improvement in crop height, yield attributes, yield, nutrients uptake, consumptive use, rate of water use and soil moisture extraction were with conventional furrow irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–435
t0

“potato (Solanum tuberosum) – maize (Zea mays) cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–160

Title

Crop water use, nutrient content and uptake as influenced by irrigation and nitrogen management in potato (Solanum tuberosum) – maize (Zea mays) cropping system

SUNIL KUMAR VERMA; L K IDNANI The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2013. doi:10.56093/ijas.v82i12.26250

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-3cc459b7b49a02efeb9ce7169ef7c5974052d6ba9d5c5438d27981cec295d87b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

92 papers: 75 positive, 17 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

83 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.