Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fusarium inoculation significantly increased interstitial CO2 concentration.

A claim from Influence of interstitial carbon dioxide on deoxynivalenol accumulation in stored wheat under varying Fusarium treatments and airtight storage conditions · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium inoculation significantly increased interstitial CO2 concentration.

Treatment
Fusarium inoculatione0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
interstitial CO 2 concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium inoculation significantly increased interstitial CO 2 concentration, daily CO 2 production (generated interstitially depending on airtight duration), and accumulated CO 2 production (accumulated interstitially until the end of the storage period)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–1030
t0

“stored wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87

Title

Influence of interstitial carbon dioxide on deoxynivalenol accumulation in stored wheat under varying Fusarium treatments and airtight storage conditions

Aanchal Pande; Fuji Jian; Jitendra Paliwal; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2026. doi:10.1002/jsfa.70527

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-41bcedef2437f51b781089260ce4d2def7f3114719711bc87b911e76956ce796 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Fusarium · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
See all 6 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 95 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.