Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Normal irrigation did not differ significantly from heading deficit in grains per spike and spike length or ripening deficit in spike length in the second season.

A claim from Effects of Some Antioxidant Materials as a Foliar and Water Deficit Stress at Identify Growth Stages on Productivity of Wheat Crop · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal irrigation did not differ significantly from heading deficit in grains per spike and spike length or ripening deficit in spike length in the second season.

Treatment
normal irrigatione1
Outcome
number of grains/spike and spike lengthe0
Qualifier
in the second seasone0
Comparator
water deficit stress atheading stagee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatments of water deficit stress atheading stage in number of grains/spike and spike length characters and at ripening stage in spike length character in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1608
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–130
e1

“The normal irrigation recorded the highest signicficantly values in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–863

Title

Effects of Some Antioxidant Materials as a Foliar and Water Deficit Stress at Identify Growth Stages on Productivity of Wheat Crop

A. Mohamed; E. Abo-Marzoka Journal of Plant Production 2017. doi:10.21608/jpp.2017.39967

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-459e6844aea51c3bdaefb25412ee5b48a2c728644b5de45e59ce7b94e7a8dbb1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

191 papers in the same direction as this claim · 797 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.