Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The reported normal irrigation and water deficit treatments did not differ significantly in grain weight per spike, grain yield and plant height in the first season.

A claim from Effects of Some Antioxidant Materials as a Foliar and Water Deficit Stress at Identify Growth Stages on Productivity of Wheat Crop · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported normal irrigation and water deficit treatments did not differ significantly in grain weight per spike, grain yield and plant height in the first season.

Treatment
normal irrigatione0
Outcome
grains weight/spike, grain yeild and plant heighete0
Qualifier
in the first seasone0
Comparator
water deficit stress at tillering, heading and ripening stagese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the normal irrigation did not significantly differed with the treatments of water deficit stress at tillering, heading and ripening stages in grains weight/spike, grain yeild and plant heighet characters respictively in the first season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1421
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–130

Title

Effects of Some Antioxidant Materials as a Foliar and Water Deficit Stress at Identify Growth Stages on Productivity of Wheat Crop

A. Mohamed; E. Abo-Marzoka Journal of Plant Production 2017. doi:10.21608/jpp.2017.39967

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e9ddb3f61c2ac28ed0e375747130dfe94a8df039ef792f701e6653dc3df9a67a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

191 papers in the same direction as this claim · 797 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.