Intervention effectmodel-written summary

UV-B radiation did not affect total pollen protein content in maize.

A claim from Biochemical and Ultrastructural Changes in Pollen ofZea maysL. Grown Under Enhanced UV-B Radiation · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B radiation did not affect total pollen protein content in maize.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Material
LG12e0
Organ / stage
pollene3
Treatment
PAR light supplemented with UV-B radiatione1
Outcome
Total pollen protein contente3
Direction
not affectede3
Comparator
PAR lighte1

Not reportedGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zea mays L. cv. LG12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–126
e1

“grown in a growth chamber under PAR light supplemented with UV-B radiation and compared with a second set of plants grown under PAR light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–264
e3

“Total pollen protein content was not affected but UV-B absorbing pigments increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–501

Title

Biochemical and Ultrastructural Changes in Pollen ofZea maysL. Grown Under Enhanced UV-B Radiation

A SANTOS Annals of Botany 1998. doi:10.1006/anbo.1998.0724

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-45f05f717ed5e2da9160fade36a856c1a7b0370d6057d591a034c10fe7f92998 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

radiation · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
See all 6 papers →

light · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

uv · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
    UV-B radiation did not affect total pollen protein content.

    Contents and Index to Volume 82 · 1998 · compared with plants grown under PAR light

    Same direction

  5. no effect
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.