Paper · 2018 · Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment

Evaluation of the Use of Gamma Radiation for Reduction of Aflatoxin B1 in Corn (Zea mays) Used in the Production of Feed for Broiler Chickens

Marco Sinche Serra; Marco Burbano Pulles; Freddy Torres Mayanquer; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Corn is one of the main grasses used to produce human or animal food. One of the main problems with the use of corn is the presence of mycotoxins, where aflatoxin B1 is one of the most harmful for human and animal health. Chemical methods such as the addition of antifungals and sequestrants are used to control this contaminant in food; however, these methods can leave dangerous residues. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of irradiation with gamma rays on corn for the control of aflatoxin B1. For this purpose, three treatments were compared: treatment 1, application of gamma radiation, treatment 2, application of antifungal and treatment 3, combination of gamma radiation and application of antifungal. Corn without exposure to any control of aflatoxin was used as a witness group. Irradiation doses of 2, 6 and 10 kGy were tested, and the dose of 6 kGy was selected as the best since it lowered aflatoxin B1 more effectively. The corn analyzed in this study was stored during 45 days at 23°C, and every 15 days. We determined the concentration of aflatoxin B1, presence or absence of pathogenic microorganisms and insects, and we evaluated the physicochemical characteristics of the grain. Then, the treatments were compared and treatment 1, only irradiation with gamma rays, proved to be significantly more effective in the reduction of aflatoxin B1 and the total inhibition of the survival of the insects during the 45 days of storage which allowed better preservation of the protein. All treatments controlled the growing of pathogenic microorganisms as Salmonella and Enterobacteriacea, and kept the humidity of the grain in values lower than 13%. The cost production of a bag of 40 kg of feed was also estimated in USD 22.56; which is1.80% greater than the cost corresponding to the conventional process that uses mycotoxin sequestrants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A gamma dose of 6 kGy was the best tested dose for lowering aflatoxin B1 in corn.

Treatment
the dose of 6 kGye1
Outcome
aflatoxin B1e1
Direction
lowerede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn is one of the main grasses used to produce human or animal food”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irradiation doses of 2, 6 and 10 kGy were tested, and the dose of 6 kGy was selected as the best since it lowered aflatoxin B1 more effectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation alone was significantly more effective than the antifungal and combined treatments in reducing aflatoxin B1.

Treatment
only irradiation with gamma rayse1
Outcome
reduction of aflatoxin B1e1
Direction
significantly more effectivee1
Comparator
application of antifungale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn is one of the main grasses used to produce human or animal food”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment 1, only irradiation with gamma rays, proved to be significantly more effective in the reduction of aflatoxin B1 and the total inhibition of the survival of the insects during the 45 days of storage which allowed better preservation of the protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1518 · show in text ↑
e2

“treatment 2, application of antifungal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation alone totally inhibited survival of insects during 45 days of storage.

Treatment
only irradiation with gamma rayse1
Interactor
insectsInsectae1pest
Outcome
total inhibition of the survival of the insectse1
Qualifier
during the 45 days of storagee1
Comparator
application of antifungale2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn is one of the main grasses used to produce human or animal food”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment 1, only irradiation with gamma rays, proved to be significantly more effective in the reduction of aflatoxin B1 and the total inhibition of the survival of the insects during the 45 days of storage which allowed better preservation of the protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1518 · show in text ↑
e2

“treatment 2, application of antifungal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation alone allowed better preservation of corn protein during storage.

Treatment
only irradiation with gamma rayse1
Outcome
preservation of the proteine1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
application of antifungale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn is one of the main grasses used to produce human or animal food”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment 1, only irradiation with gamma rays, proved to be significantly more effective in the reduction of aflatoxin B1 and the total inhibition of the survival of the insects during the 45 days of storage which allowed better preservation of the protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1518 · show in text ↑
e2

“treatment 2, application of antifungal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments controlled growth of Salmonella and Enterobacteriaceae in stored corn.

Treatment
All treatmentse1
Interactor
SalmonellaSalmonellae1pathogen
Second interactor
Enterobacteriaceae1pathogen
Outcome
growing of pathogenic microorganismse1
Direction
controllede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salmonella
Salmonella · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)NIAID : These high-resolution (300 dpi) images may be downloaded directly from this site. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn is one of the main grasses used to produce human or animal food”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“All treatments controlled the growing of pathogenic microorganisms as Salmonella and Enterobacteriacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1622 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain humidity was kept lower than 13% under all treatments.

Outcome
humidity of the graine1
Value
lower than 13%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn is one of the main grasses used to produce human or animal food”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“kept the humidity of the grain in values lower than 13%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1683 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated cost of a 40 kg bag of feed was USD 22.56, 1.80% greater than the conventional process.

Outcome
cost production of a bag of 40 kg of feede1
Value
USD 22.56e1
Qualifier
1.80% greater than the cost corresponding to the conventional processe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn is one of the main grasses used to produce human or animal food”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cost production of a bag of 40 kg of feed was also estimated in USD 22.56; which is1.80% greater than the cost corresponding to the conventional process that uses mycotoxin sequestrants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1874 · show in text ↑

radiation · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

radiation · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.