Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 0.8 IW/CPE and 75% RDF plus charred rice husk and mycorrhiza treatment gave higher groundnut growth attributes.

A claim from Green and Blue Water Footprint for Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under Irrigation Scheduling and Nutrient Management Practices · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.8 IW/CPE and 75% RDF plus charred rice husk and mycorrhiza treatment gave higher groundnut growth attributes.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
irrigation scheduling at 0.8 IW/CPE ratios along with the application of 75% RDF and 5 tones/ha of charred rice husk as basal with seed treatment of Arbuscular mycorrhizae0
Interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
growth attributese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study revealed that the growth attributes, pod yield and haulm yield, rain and irrigation water content and water use studies of groundnut were registered higher with irrigation scheduling at 0.8 IW/CPE ratios along with the application of 75% RDF and 5 tones/ha of charred rice husk as basal with seed treatment of Arbuscular mycorrhiza”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1384

Title

Green and Blue Water Footprint for Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under Irrigation Scheduling and Nutrient Management Practices

P. Balasubramanian; R. Babu; C.R. Chinnamuthu; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2022. doi:10.18805/lr-4812

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-484282935de807b4ba7e648f5d2c5f4614aca57541bcbf27cbfefcd9e994b248 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Oryza sativa · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

irrigation · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 29 positive, 11 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.