Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zero tillage after sesbania and direct-seeded rice increased total soil organic carbon by 13–22%.

A claim from Sesbania brown manuring improves soil health, productivity, and profitability of post-rice bread wheat and chickpea · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage after sesbania and direct-seeded rice increased total soil organic carbon by 13–22%.

Treatment
Zero tillagee0
Outcome
total soil organic carbone0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13–22%e0
Qualifier
in both yearse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zero tillage in wheat or chickpea in the plots previously cultivated with co-culture of sesbania and direct-seeded rice increased total soil organic carbon by 13–22% in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1135

Title

Sesbania brown manuring improves soil health, productivity, and profitability of post-rice bread wheat and chickpea

Muhammad Farooq; Naqib Ullah; Faisal Nadeem; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2021. doi:10.1017/s0014479721000090

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-485181b0bdae5cbb43c5e753cc114470abd2cc9e5cba4fba25ce9da999644136 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 50 positive, 6 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

tillage · soil: chemistry · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.