Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soybean and wheat plus red clover consistently supported high first-year corn yield.

A claim from Managing Soil Carbon and Nitrogen for Productivity and Environmental Quality · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean and wheat plus red clover consistently supported high first-year corn yield.

Treatment
combination of soybean and wheat plus red clovere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
alwayse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of soybean and wheat plus red clover ( Trifolium pratense L.) always supported high yield for first‐year corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1349

Title

Managing Soil Carbon and Nitrogen for Productivity and Environmental Quality

Jose E. Sanchez; Richard R. Harwood; Thomas C. Willson; et al. Agronomy Journal 2004. doi:10.2134/agronj2004.0769

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-4958c6dbdcd151b8c983e372ba826702e7e99c606c531b3ef71393ab339d729a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

Trifolium pratense · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 83 positive, 19 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
    Winter annual forage reduced subsequent corn yield.

    Integrating a Double‐Cropped Winter Annual Forage into a Corn‐Soybean Rotation · 2002 · compared with treatments thatdid not have a double‐crop winter annual forage

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 155 positive, 25 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

171 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.