Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Long 18-day irrigation with separate organic fertilizer decreased wheat water use efficiency.

A claim from Impact of Irrigation Intervals and Fertilization on Actual Evapotranspiration and Wheat Production · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long 18-day irrigation with separate organic fertilizer decreased wheat water use efficiency.

Treatment
long irrigation interval of 18 days with separately organic fertilizere1
Outcome
WUS valuese1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency (WUS) of wheat under furrow irrigation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–475
e1

“irrigated by the long irrigation interval of 18 days with separately organic fertilizer decreased WUS values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2963–3071

Title

Impact of Irrigation Intervals and Fertilization on Actual Evapotranspiration and Wheat Production

Manal El-Nady; A Shalaby; M Al-Kaisi; et al. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science 2014. doi:10.21608/ejss.2014.180

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-4a5eadefbb0ad7ffd3d9b60146d35ea52e9b513a0d7a2910e770a7c05e007194 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

fertilization · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 98 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim · 252 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

294 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.