Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation at jointing gave a greater grain yield rate than other irrigation treatments.

A claim from INCREASED WATER PRODUCTIVITY OF WHEAT UNDER SUPPLEMENTAL IRRIGATION AND NITROGEN APPLICATION IN A SEMI-ARID REGION · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at jointing gave a greater grain yield rate than other irrigation treatments.

Treatment
irrigation treatment at the jointing stagee0
Outcome
rate of grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
other irrigation treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of grain yield and water productivity in irrigation treatment at the jointing stage was greater than the other irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1046
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37

Title

INCREASED WATER PRODUCTIVITY OF WHEAT UNDER SUPPLEMENTAL IRRIGATION AND NITROGEN APPLICATION IN A SEMI-ARID REGION

M. R. Tadayon; Rahim Ebrahimi; Ali Tadayyon http://jast.modares.ac.ir/article_4870_4273823db5e86fbfbca5015445b183f3.pdf 2012

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-4d7c875f573d5b1c83b74f72bbb2bdba9a62351e21d14fec38b14500180e4d02 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.