Paper · 2016 · Egyptian Journal of Agronomy

Simulation of Wheat Yield Using the RZWQM as Affected by Supplemental Irrigation in the North Western Coast of Egypt

A El-Sadek; E Salem; S Abbas; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

N ARID and semi-arid regions, the amount of rainfall and its …distribution greatly affect the productivity of crops in these regions. Rainfall deficits during the critical growth stages can cause a sever crop yield losses. The study was carried out at the agricultural Experimental station, Sustainable Development Center of Matrouh Resources, Egypt, during 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 rainfall seasons to evaluate the effect of different supplemental irrigation treatments on wheat yield . The irrigation treatments included rainfall only (control), one irrigation of 50 mm at tillering or booting or grain filling, two irrigations of 100 mm at tillering and booting or tillering and grain filling or booting and grain filling, and three irrigations of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and grain filling. The obtained results showed that the application of supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and filling secured the highest significantly values of plant height (61.47 cm), spike length (9.07 cm) and number of grains/spike (46.67) in the first season only, 1000 grain weight (39.72 and 48.53 g), biological yield (5.10 and 8.72 t/ha), grain yield (1.55 and 3.40 t/ha) , straw yield (3.54 and 5.35 t/ha) and WUE (0.672 and 1.08 kg/m3) in both seasons, respectively. Wheat yield in the second season under the different supplemental irrigation treatments was simulated using the Root Zone Water Quality Model. Results showed a very good agreement between simulated and observed yields with a Nash- Sutcliff Efficiency (NSE) of 0.93. It could be concluded that supplemental irrigation is highly important for achieving a good economic yield of wheat under the rainfed condition of Matrouh Governorate, moreover the RZWQM successfully simulated the wheat yield under water stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations totaling 150 mm at tillering, booting, and filling gave the highest plant height of 61.47 cm in the first season.

Treatment
supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and fillinge0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
61.47 cme0
Qualifier
in the first season onlye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and filling secured the highest significantly values of plant height (61.47 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1025 · show in text ↑
e1

“in the first season only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 mm schedule gave the highest spike length of 9.07 cm in the first season.

Treatment
supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and fillinge0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.07 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and filling secured the highest significantly values of plant height (61.47 cm), spike length (9.07 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1049 · show in text ↑
e1

“in the first season only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 mm schedule gave the highest number of grains per spike, 46.67, in the first season.

Treatment
supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and fillinge0
Outcome
number of grains/spikee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
46.67e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and filling secured the highest significantly values of plant height (61.47 cm), spike length (9.07 cm) and number of grains/spike (46.67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 mm schedule gave the highest 1000 grain weight, 39.72 and 48.53 g across the two seasons.

Treatment
supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and fillinge0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
39.72 and 48.53 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and filling secured the highest significantly values of plant height (61.47 cm), spike length (9.07 cm) and number of grains/spike (46.67) in the first season only, 1000 grain weight (39.72 and 48.53 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 mm schedule gave the highest biological yield, 5.10 and 8.72 t/ha across the two seasons.

Treatment
supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and fillinge0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.10 and 8.72 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and filling secured the highest significantly values of plant height (61.47 cm), spike length (9.07 cm) and number of grains/spike (46.67) in the first season only, 1000 grain weight (39.72 and 48.53 g), biological yield (5.10 and 8.72 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 mm schedule gave the highest grain yield, 1.55 and 3.40 t/ha across the two seasons.

Treatment
supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and fillinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.55 and 3.40 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and filling secured the highest significantly values of plant height (61.47 cm), spike length (9.07 cm) and number of grains/spike (46.67) in the first season only, 1000 grain weight (39.72 and 48.53 g), biological yield (5.10 and 8.72 t/ha), grain yield (1.55 and 3.40 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 mm schedule gave the highest straw yield, 3.54 and 5.35 t/ha across the two seasons.

Treatment
supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and fillinge0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.54 and 5.35 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and filling secured the highest significantly values of plant height (61.47 cm), spike length (9.07 cm) and number of grains/spike (46.67) in the first season only, 1000 grain weight (39.72 and 48.53 g), biological yield (5.10 and 8.72 t/ha), grain yield (1.55 and 3.40 t/ha) , straw yield (3.54 and 5.35 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 mm schedule gave the highest water use efficiency, 0.672 and 1.08 kg/m3 across the two seasons.

Treatment
supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and fillinge0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.672 and 1.08 kg/m3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and filling secured the highest significantly values of plant height (61.47 cm), spike length (9.07 cm) and number of grains/spike (46.67) in the first season only, 1000 grain weight (39.72 and 48.53 g), biological yield (5.10 and 8.72 t/ha), grain yield (1.55 and 3.40 t/ha) , straw yield (3.54 and 5.35 t/ha) and WUE (0.672 and 1.08 kg/m3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RZWQM simulated second-season wheat yields with close agreement to observations, with NSE of 0.93.

Outcome
simulated and observed yieldse0
Value
0.93e0
Qualifier
the second seasone1
Comparator
observed yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed a very good agreement between simulated and observed yields with a Nash- Sutcliff Efficiency (NSE) of 0.93”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1583 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat yield in the second season under the different supplemental irrigation treatments was simulated using the Root Zone Water Quality Model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude supplemental irrigation is important for economic wheat yield under rainfed conditions in Matrouh Governorate.

Outcome
supplemental irrigatione0
Setting
Matrouh Governoratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplemental irrigation is highly important for achieving a good economic yield of wheat under the rainfed condition of Matrouh Governorate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1751 · show in text ↑

tillage · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

117 papers: 97 positive, 20 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.