Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Three irrigations totaling 150 mm at tillering, booting, and filling gave the highest plant height of 61.47 cm in the first season.

A claim from Simulation of Wheat Yield Using the RZWQM as Affected by Supplemental Irrigation in the North Western Coast of Egypt · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations totaling 150 mm at tillering, booting, and filling gave the highest plant height of 61.47 cm in the first season.

Treatment
supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and fillinge0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
61.47 cme0
Qualifier
in the first season onlye1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of supplemental irrigation of 150 mm at the three stages of tillering, booting and filling secured the highest significantly values of plant height (61.47 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1025
e1

“in the first season only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1109
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19

Title

Simulation of Wheat Yield Using the RZWQM as Affected by Supplemental Irrigation in the North Western Coast of Egypt

A El-Sadek; E Salem; S Abbas; et al. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy 2016. doi:10.21608/agro.2016.611

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-5e586980991dfb8c1e1c683abc03a368ed2a5c43d70ffe618a042a73e0d5acff · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this claim · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.