Paper · 2012 · http://jast.modares.ac.ir/article_4870_4273823db5e86fbfbca5015445b183f3.pdf

INCREASED WATER PRODUCTIVITY OF WHEAT UNDER SUPPLEMENTAL IRRIGATION AND NITROGEN APPLICATION IN A SEMI-ARID REGION

M. R. Tadayon; Rahim Ebrahimi; Ali Tadayyon

13
claims
22
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Limitations of water and nitrogen in soil usually restrict plant growth. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different amounts of supplemental irrigation at different growth stages and application of different rates of nitrogen fertilizer on grain yield and water productivity of wheat cultivars. A field experiment was conducted in the agricultural research station of Shahrekord University, Iran, for 2 years. The experiment had a split-split plot design with 3 replications. Five irrigation treatments occupied the main plots, two wheat cultivars were the sub-plots, and three levels of nitrogen were allocated to the sub-subplots. Seed yield and water productivity increased with the total amount of water available to plants. Water productivity increased linearly with increasing additional irrigation from the jointing stage to the seed filling stage, in both years. However, the rate of grain yield and water productivity in irrigation treatment at the jointing stage was greater than the other irrigation treatments. Both wheat varieties showed positive response to supplemental irrigation treatments and nitrogen fertilizer, but the rate of grain yield and water productivity was greater in Azar2 cultivar. Additional nitrogen fertilizers also increased seed yield and water productivity in both years. Generally, the combination of supplemental irrigation at jointing stage and application of 100 kg nitrogen ha-1 have important roles in the improvement of seed yield and water productivity of Sardari wheat cultivar under semi arid region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield increased with total available water.

Treatment
total amount of water available to plantse0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield and water productivity increased with the total amount of water available to plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity increased with total available water.

Treatment
total amount of water available to plantse0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield and water productivity increased with the total amount of water available to plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity increased linearly with additional irrigation from jointing through seed filling in both years.

Treatment
increasing additional irrigatione0
Outcome
Water productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
from the jointing stage to the seed filling stage, in both yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water productivity increased linearly with increasing additional irrigation from the jointing stage to the seed filling stage, in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at jointing gave a greater grain yield rate than other irrigation treatments.

Treatment
irrigation treatment at the jointing stagee0
Outcome
rate of grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
other irrigation treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of grain yield and water productivity in irrigation treatment at the jointing stage was greater than the other irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at jointing gave a greater water productivity rate than other irrigation treatments.

Treatment
irrigation treatment at the jointing stagee0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
other irrigation treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of grain yield and water productivity in irrigation treatment at the jointing stage was greater than the other irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both wheat varieties responded positively to supplemental irrigation.

Treatment
supplemental irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
positive responsee0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both wheat varieties showed positive response to supplemental irrigation treatments and nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both wheat varieties responded positively to nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
positive responsee0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both wheat varieties showed positive response to supplemental irrigation treatments and nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1155 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azar2 had greater grain yield rate than the other wheat variety.

Material
Azar2e0
Outcome
rate of grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of grain yield and water productivity was greater in Azar2 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azar2 had greater water productivity rate than the other wheat variety.

Material
Azar2e0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of grain yield and water productivity was greater in Azar2 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional nitrogen increased seed yield in both years.

Treatment
Additional nitrogen fertilizerse0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional nitrogen fertilizers also increased seed yield and water productivity in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional nitrogen increased water productivity in both years.

Treatment
Additional nitrogen fertilizerse0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional nitrogen fertilizers also increased seed yield and water productivity in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that jointing-stage irrigation with 100 kg nitrogen ha-1 improves Sardari seed yield.

Material
Sardarie0
Treatment
supplemental irrigation at jointing stage and application of 100 kg nitrogen ha-1e0
Outcome
improvement of seed yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of supplemental irrigation at jointing stage and application of 100 kg nitrogen ha-1 have important roles in the improvement of seed yield and water productivity of Sardari wheat cultivar under semi arid region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1572 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that jointing-stage irrigation with 100 kg nitrogen ha-1 improves Sardari water productivity.

Material
Sardarie0
Treatment
supplemental irrigation at jointing stage and application of 100 kg nitrogen ha-1e0
Outcome
water productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of supplemental irrigation at jointing stage and application of 100 kg nitrogen ha-1 have important roles in the improvement of seed yield and water productivity of Sardari wheat cultivar under semi arid region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1572 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.