Intervention effectmodel-written summary

ZT + R with improved RDN increased biological yield by 10.10% versus CT with RDN.

A claim from Influence of tillage, residue and nitrogen placement on maize growth and yield under conservation agriculture · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZT + R with improved RDN increased biological yield by 10.10% versus CT with RDN.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ZT + R in combination with improved RDNe0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.10 %e0
Comparator
CT with RDNe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZT + R in combination with improved RDN resulted in significantly higher stover and biological yield by 10.40 and 10.10 %, respectively, as compared to CT with RDN.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1778
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61

Title

Influence of tillage, residue and nitrogen placement on maize growth and yield under conservation agriculture

Akshay Glotra; Shankar Lal Jat; A K Singh; et al. Plant Science Today 2024. doi:10.14719/pst.3662

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-4eef9ff8b2c20ae9eb01f98a6c1201ab02546395854209e58c3695ff08ce669e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.