Intervention effectmodel-written summary

ZT + R significantly increased maize dry matter accumulation versus CT by 7.50-7.73 %.

A claim from Influence of tillage, residue and nitrogen placement on maize growth and yield under conservation agriculture · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZT + R significantly increased maize dry matter accumulation versus CT by 7.50-7.73 %.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
ZT + Re0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation (DMA)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.50-7.73 %e0
Comparator
CTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ZT + R treatment resulted in significantly higher plant height (6.61-7.02 %) and dry matter accumulation (DMA) (7.50-7.73 %) during different crop growth stages in maize compared to CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1286

Title

Influence of tillage, residue and nitrogen placement on maize growth and yield under conservation agriculture

Akshay Glotra; Shankar Lal Jat; A K Singh; et al. Plant Science Today 2024. doi:10.14719/pst.3662

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e753a2f6bdfcebd123b7c2ad3e21f1d063208498735c02862545d5f1d1e4f78b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.