Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under water deficit irrigation, root length and root surface area increased at flowering.

A claim from Effects of Water and Nitrogen Utilized by Means of Dripping on Growth of Root and Canopy and Matter Distribution in Spring Wheat · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water deficit irrigation, root length and root surface area increased at flowering.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee2
Treatment
water deficit irrigation treatments (2400 m3/ha)e2
Outcome
root length and root surface areae2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232
e2

“In water deficit irrigation treatments (2400 m3/ha), root length and root surface area increased in flowering stage, but rapid declined in milking stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–599

Title

Effects of Water and Nitrogen Utilized by Means of Dripping on Growth of Root and Canopy and Matter Distribution in Spring Wheat

Jichuan Wang; Cuilian Xu; Shan Gao; et al. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology 2013. doi:10.19026/ajfst.5.3294

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-4f5a20370b5204dd2cb2a18942f26c7f0e404fd70d264990afdf69ac65aa35fb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this claim · 343 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

422 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.