Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zinc and phosphorus application significantly increased wheat straw yield.

A claim from Response of Wheat to Zinc and Phosphorus in a Highly Calcareous Soil · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc and phosphorus application significantly increased wheat straw yield.

Treatment
zinc and phosphorust0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of both these nutrients increased significantly the grain and straw yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–277
t0

“zinc and phosphorus”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 21–40

Title

Response of Wheat to Zinc and Phosphorus in a Highly Calcareous Soil

D. Damodarreddy; B.R. Yadav Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 1994

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-4f86a445a308de141092488c99f2e890c11012667b7d483e334dc09d8eea6fd7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    The highest pooled basmati rice and wheat yields occurred with soil phosphorus and foliar zinc.

    Effect of zinc application methods on apparent utilization efficiency of zinc and phosphorus fertilizers under basmati rice–wheat rotation · 2013

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. no effect
    Zinc application yielded hardly any benefit.

    Landscape positions dictating crop fertilizer responses in wheat-based farming systems of East African Highlands · 2020

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Zinc inhibited non mycorrhizal wheat root dry yield.

    Arbuscular mycorrhizal strategy for zinc mycoremediation and diminished translocation to shoots and grains in wheat · 2017

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Foliar Zn had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

    Foliar zinc fertilization improves the zinc nutritional value of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain · 2011

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Zinc supply had little effect on wheat biomass.

    Plant growth and cation composition of two cultivars of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in P uptake efficiency · 2001

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Soil Zn fertilisers had no significant effect on grain Zn concentration or yield.

    Site-Specific Factors Influence the Field Performance of a Zn-Biofortified Wheat Variety · 2020

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Soil Zn application did not significantly affect wheat grain yield.

    Relevance for food sciences of quantitative spatially resolved element profile investigations in wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) grain · 2013

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Zn-EDTA gave the opposite grain yield result to ZnSO4.

    Zinc Enrichment in Two Contrasting Genotypes of Triticum aestivum L. Grains: Interactions between Edaphic Conditions and Foliar Fertilizers · 2021 · compared with ZnSO4

    Opposite direction

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this claim · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    The highest pooled basmati rice and wheat yields occurred with soil phosphorus and foliar zinc.

    Effect of zinc application methods on apparent utilization efficiency of zinc and phosphorus fertilizers under basmati rice–wheat rotation · 2013

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Low phosphorus stress reduced tiller number in Kenong 199 wheat.

    Transcriptome analysis of axillary buds in low phosphorus stress and functional analysis of TaWRKY74s in wheat · 2024

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    RAC875 had higher grain yield than Wyalkatchem at maturity under low phosphorus.

    Variation in root system architecture and morphology of two wheat genotypes is a predictor of their tolerance to phosphorus deficiency · 2019

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  4. no effect
    Neither nitrogen nor phosphorus produced a significant grain yield response.

    Water use, growth and yield of wheat in a subtropical environment · 1980

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nano-N with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Incorporating P and K into the subsoil did not further change wheat yield.

    The effects of subsoiling and deep incorporation of P and K fertilizers on the yield and nutrient uptake of barley, potatoes, wheat and sugar beet grown in rotation · 1979

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Applications of multiple nutrients did not significantly increase wheat yield.

    Evidence for the involvement of the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus thornei in wheat yield decline in northern New South Wales · 1987

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization did not significantly influence kernels per head or kernel weight.

    Adventitious Roots, Tillers, and Grain Yields of Spring Wheat as Influenced by N‐P Fertilization1 · 1970

    Opposite direction

563 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.