Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Compared with the control without foliar spraying, the berry content of dry substances and vitamins increased significantly with the seaweed-extract fertilizer.

A claim from Compliance with regulatory requirements for the quality characteristics of grapes when using fertilizers based on seaweed extract · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the control without foliar spraying, the berry content of dry substances and vitamins increased significantly with the seaweed-extract fertilizer.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
organomineral fertilizers based on Ascophyllum nodosum extracte2
Outcome
dry substances, vitaminse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the control variante1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“quality characteristics of grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–81
e0

“increased significantly: the berry content of dry substances, vitamins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1856–1926
e1

“In comparison with the control variant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1725
e2

“organomineral fertilizers based on Ascophyllum nodosum extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–170

Title

Compliance with regulatory requirements for the quality characteristics of grapes when using fertilizers based on seaweed extract

D.E. Russo; A.A. Krasilnikov; T.G. Prichko; et al. Fruit growing and viticulture of South Russia 2025. doi:10.30679/2219-5335-2025-2-92-77-89

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-4fadcd255b1f7debf5b7f79bcbc38c4034c60f820bd02a1633ef162a8dba2e9d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Ascophyllum nodosum · quality: phytochemicals · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · VitisResults agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.