Abstract
The article presents the results of studies, carried out in 2018-2020 in soil and climatic conditions of viticultural zone of the South Coast of Crimea on wine grape variety ‘Cabernet-Sauvignon’. It was established that double application of national chelated micronutrient fertilizers Tiaton and Chelaton Extra for foliar dressing of grapes contributed to an increase in the average bunch weight by 9.3-15.3 g (10.3-16.9%), shoot productivity by 10.4-17.1% and cropping power by 0.6-1 t/ha (10-16.7%) in comparison with the control. It was experimentally determined that test treatments with Chelaton Extra preparation led to a significant increase in the average length of annual shoots by 13.3 cm (9.3%) and a gain in the green matter of bushes by 265.9 cm 3 (12%). Using of the studied micronutrient fertilizers against the background of increased grape productivity positively influenced the process of sugar accumulation and ensured the value component at the control level. The studies have proven that double treatment with Chelaton Extra fertilizer contributed to an increase in the mass concentration of phenolic substances in wine by 10.7%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Double foliar Tiaton and Chelaton Extra increased grape average bunch weight by 9.3-15.3 g (10.3-16.9%) versus control.
- Taxon
- grapese0
- Treatment
- double application of national chelated micronutrient fertilizers Tiaton and Chelaton Extrae0
- Outcome
- average bunch weighte0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 9.3-15.3 g (10.3-16.9%)e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedMaterial
Verbatim
e0“double application of national chelated micronutrient fertilizers Tiaton and Chelaton Extra for foliar dressing of grapes contributed to an increase in the average bunch weight by 9.3-15.3 g (10.3-16.9%), shoot productivity by 10.4-17.1% and cropping power by 0.6-1 t/ha (10-16.7%) in comparison with the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Double foliar Tiaton and Chelaton Extra increased grape shoot productivity by 10.4-17.1% versus control.
- Taxon
- grapese0
- Treatment
- double application of national chelated micronutrient fertilizers Tiaton and Chelaton Extrae0
- Outcome
- shoot productivitye0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 10.4-17.1%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedMaterial
Verbatim
e0“double application of national chelated micronutrient fertilizers Tiaton and Chelaton Extra for foliar dressing of grapes contributed to an increase in the average bunch weight by 9.3-15.3 g (10.3-16.9%), shoot productivity by 10.4-17.1% and cropping power by 0.6-1 t/ha (10-16.7%) in comparison with the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Double foliar Tiaton and Chelaton Extra increased grape cropping power by 0.6-1 t/ha (10-16.7%) versus control.
- Taxon
- grapese0
- Treatment
- double application of national chelated micronutrient fertilizers Tiaton and Chelaton Extrae0
- Outcome
- cropping powere0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.6-1 t/ha (10-16.7%)e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedMaterial
Verbatim
e0“double application of national chelated micronutrient fertilizers Tiaton and Chelaton Extra for foliar dressing of grapes contributed to an increase in the average bunch weight by 9.3-15.3 g (10.3-16.9%), shoot productivity by 10.4-17.1% and cropping power by 0.6-1 t/ha (10-16.7%) in comparison with the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Chelaton Extra significantly increased annual shoot length by 13.3 cm (9.3%).
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Treatment
- Chelaton Extra preparatione0
- Outcome
- average length of annual shootse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 13.3 cm (9.3%)e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“test treatments with Chelaton Extra preparation led to a significant increase in the average length of annual shoots by 13.3 cm (9.3%) and a gain in the green matter of bushes by 265.9 cm 3 (12%).”
t0“grape plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Chelaton Extra increased grape bush green matter by 265.9 cm 3 (12%).
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Treatment
- Chelaton Extra preparatione0
- Outcome
- green matter of bushese0
- Direction
- gaine0
- Value
- 265.9 cm 3 (12%)e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“test treatments with Chelaton Extra preparation led to a significant increase in the average length of annual shoots by 13.3 cm (9.3%) and a gain in the green matter of bushes by 265.9 cm 3 (12%).”
t0“grape plants”
Claim · model-written summary
The micronutrient fertilizers favored sugar accumulation in grapes.
- Taxon
- grapee0
- Treatment
- studied micronutrient fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- sugar accumulatione0
- Direction
- positively influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Using of the studied micronutrient fertilizers against the background of increased grape productivity positively influenced the process of sugar accumulation and ensured the value component at the control level.”
Claim · model-written summary
The wine value component remained at the control level under micronutrient fertilization.
Verbatim
e0“Using of the studied micronutrient fertilizers against the background of increased grape productivity positively influenced the process of sugar accumulation and ensured the value component at the control level.”
Claim · model-written summary
Double Chelaton Extra treatment increased wine phenolic substance concentration by 10.7%.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Treatment
- double treatment with Chelaton Extra fertilizere0
- Outcome
- mass concentration of phenolic substances in winee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 10.7%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“double treatment with Chelaton Extra fertilizer contributed to an increase in the mass concentration of phenolic substances in wine by 10.7%.”
t0“grape plants”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →micronutrient · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
micronutrient · yield · VitisResults agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · VitisResults agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.