Paper · 2016 · Russian Agency for Digital Standardization

Влияние внекорневых подкормок жидкимимикроудобрениями на продуктивность и качество винограда

Bairambekov, B.; Kumasheva, B.N.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The article presents the results of studying of the impact of fertilizers on the yielding capacity and quality of two grapes varieties of different ripening groups in the conditions of the Astrakhan region. The purpose of this research is the identifi cation of the most effective micronutrients for the foliar application as an element of cultivation technology of table grapes. On the experimental plot there is a vineyard with following features: covered, irrigated, ungrafted. The scheme of planting is 2×3 m, 1670 vines per 1 hectare. The system of vine formation is Moldavian espalier. The vines were treated in the morning hours by aqueous solution of fertilizer with knapsack sprayer to the extent of 0,5 liter / per vine before fl owering, after fl owering and during the period of berry as a pea size on the recognized varieties of different ripening periods – Ranniy Magaracha and Karaburnu. It was found a positive impact of all forms of fertilizers on grape yielding capacity of both varieties. There were obtained signifi cant raise of productivity thanks to use of Citovit, Siliplant, Ekofus and Nagro fertilizers on early ripening variety – Ranniy Magaracha (12,5-19,6 %), and on the middle ripening variety Karaburnu (16,6-23,0 %) in relation to the control variant. The application of highly concentrated liquid compound nanotechnological fertilizer Nagro contributed to receiving of high rate of yield of Ranniy Magaracha – 13,4 t/ha (control variant – 11,2 t/ha), Karaburnu – 15,5 t/ha (control variant – 12,6 t/ha). Using of Ekofus, a unique organo-mineral fertilizer, slightly (by 0,3-0,4 t/ha) gave way to the impact of the Nagro fertilizer. Due to the application of compound micronutrients the weight of grape clusters exceeded the control variant without fertilizer accordingly: on 6,8-21,2 % for Ranniy Magaracha, on 10,4-24,5 % for Karaburnu variety. Foliar feeding encouraged the increase of the mass concentration of sugars in the grapes berries on 1,5-7,4 g/per 100 cm3 of Ranniy Magaracha variety and on 2,3-7,7 g/per 100 cm3 of Karaburnu variety.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers increased grape yield in both varieties.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
all forms of fertilizerse0
Outcome
grape yielding capacitye0
Direction
positive impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a positive impact of all forms of fertilizers on grape yielding capacity of both varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“two grapes varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Citovit increased productivity of Ranniy Magaracha by 12,5-19,6 % relative to control.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Ranniy Magarachae0
Treatment
Citovite0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
raisee0
Value
12,5-19,6 %e0
Comparator
control variante0

Verbatim

e0

“signifi cant raise of productivity thanks to use of Citovit, Siliplant, Ekofus and Nagro fertilizers on early ripening variety – Ranniy Magaracha (12,5-19,6 %), and on the middle ripening variety Karaburnu (16,6-23,0 %) in relation to the control variant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1283 · show in text ↑
e1

“two grapes varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Siliplant increased productivity of Ranniy Magaracha by 12,5-19,6 % relative to control.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Ranniy Magarachae0
Treatment
Siliplante0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
raisee0
Value
12,5-19,6 %e0
Comparator
control variante0

Verbatim

e0

“signifi cant raise of productivity thanks to use of Citovit, Siliplant, Ekofus and Nagro fertilizers on early ripening variety – Ranniy Magaracha (12,5-19,6 %), and on the middle ripening variety Karaburnu (16,6-23,0 %) in relation to the control variant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1283 · show in text ↑
e1

“two grapes varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ekofus increased productivity of Ranniy Magaracha by 12,5-19,6 % relative to control.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Ranniy Magarachae0
Treatment
Ekofuse0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
raisee0
Value
12,5-19,6 %e0
Comparator
control variante0

Verbatim

e0

“signifi cant raise of productivity thanks to use of Citovit, Siliplant, Ekofus and Nagro fertilizers on early ripening variety – Ranniy Magaracha (12,5-19,6 %), and on the middle ripening variety Karaburnu (16,6-23,0 %) in relation to the control variant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1283 · show in text ↑
e1

“two grapes varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nagro increased productivity of Ranniy Magaracha by 12,5-19,6 % relative to control.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Ranniy Magarachae0
Treatment
Nagroe0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
raisee0
Value
12,5-19,6 %e0
Comparator
control variante0

Verbatim

e0

“signifi cant raise of productivity thanks to use of Citovit, Siliplant, Ekofus and Nagro fertilizers on early ripening variety – Ranniy Magaracha (12,5-19,6 %), and on the middle ripening variety Karaburnu (16,6-23,0 %) in relation to the control variant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1283 · show in text ↑
e1

“two grapes varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The four fertilizers increased Karaburnu productivity by 16,6-23,0 % relative to control.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Karaburnue0
Treatment
Citovit, Siliplant, Ekofus and Nagro fertilizerse0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
raisee0
Value
16,6-23,0 %e0
Comparator
control variante0

Verbatim

e0

“signifi cant raise of productivity thanks to use of Citovit, Siliplant, Ekofus and Nagro fertilizers on early ripening variety – Ranniy Magaracha (12,5-19,6 %), and on the middle ripening variety Karaburnu (16,6-23,0 %) in relation to the control variant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1283 · show in text ↑
e1

“two grapes varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nagro gave Ranniy Magaracha yield of 13,4 t/ha versus 11,2 t/ha for control.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Ranniy Magarachae0
Treatment
Nagroe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highe0
Value
13,4 t/hae0
Qualifier
11,2 t/hae0
Comparator
control variante0

Verbatim

e0

“Nagro contributed to receiving of high rate of yield of Ranniy Magaracha – 13,4 t/ha (control variant – 11,2 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1482 · show in text ↑
e1

“two grapes varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nagro gave Karaburnu yield of 15,5 t/ha versus 12,6 t/ha for control.

Taxon
grapese2
Material
Karaburnue0
Treatment
Nagroe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highe1
Value
15,5 t/hae0
Qualifier
12,6 t/hae0
Comparator
control variante0

Verbatim

e0

“Karaburnu – 15,5 t/ha (control variant – 12,6 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1535 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nagro contributed to receiving of high rate of yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1420 · show in text ↑
e2

“two grapes varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ekofus yield was 0,3-0,4 t/ha lower than Nagro yield.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
Ekofuse0
Outcome
impacte0
Direction
gave waye0
Value
0,3-0,4 t/hae0
Comparator
Nagro fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“Using of Ekofus, a unique organo-mineral fertilizer, slightly (by 0,3-0,4 t/ha) gave way to the impact of the Nagro fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1664 · show in text ↑
e1

“two grapes varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrients increased Ranniy Magaracha cluster weight by 6,8-21,2 %.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Ranniy Magarachae0
Outcome
weight of grape clusterse0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
6,8-21,2 %e0
Comparator
control variant without fertilizere0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“the weight of grape clusters exceeded the control variant without fertilizer accordingly: on 6,8-21,2 % for Ranniy Magaracha, on 10,4-24,5 % for Karaburnu variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1878 · show in text ↑
e1

“two grapes varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrients increased Karaburnu cluster weight by 10,4-24,5 %.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Karaburnue0
Outcome
weight of grape clusterse0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
10,4-24,5 %e0
Comparator
control variant without fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“the weight of grape clusters exceeded the control variant without fertilizer accordingly: on 6,8-21,2 % for Ranniy Magaracha, on 10,4-24,5 % for Karaburnu variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1878 · show in text ↑
e1

“two grapes varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar feeding increased berry sugar concentration in Ranniy Magaracha by 1,5-7,4 g/per 100 cm3.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Ranniy Magarachae0
Treatment
Foliar feedinge0
Outcome
mass concentration of sugars in the grapes berriese0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1,5-7,4 g/per 100 cm3e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar feeding encouraged the increase of the mass concentration of sugars in the grapes berries on 1,5-7,4 g/per 100 cm3 of Ranniy Magaracha variety and on 2,3-7,7 g/per 100 cm3 of Karaburnu variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–2079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar feeding increased berry sugar concentration in Karaburnu by 2,3-7,7 g/per 100 cm3.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Karaburnue0
Treatment
Foliar feedinge0
Outcome
mass concentration of sugars in the grapes berriese0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2,3-7,7 g/per 100 cm3e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar feeding encouraged the increase of the mass concentration of sugars in the grapes berries on 1,5-7,4 g/per 100 cm3 of Ranniy Magaracha variety and on 2,3-7,7 g/per 100 cm3 of Karaburnu variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–2079 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

micronutrient · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.