Paper · 2020 · BIO Web of Conferences

Technological Effectiveness of Chelated Micronutrient Fertilizers in Leaf Treatments Inducing Grapes Resistance to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses

Eugeniya Yurchenko; Alexander Artamonov

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fertilizers based on complexes of chelated trace elements are the most common and effective agricultural products for the induction of protective-compensatory and other adaptive reactions of plants. The influence of various leaf treatments technologies with chelated micronutrient fertilizers application on the stability of grapes is studied under increasing abiotic and biotic environment factors within the Taman Peninsula (Russia) considering the content of proline, photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids), total water in the leaves, as well as the development of infectious drying of clusters and leaf spotting reduction due to the treatment. The new optimized scheme application on the chelated micronutrient fertilizers showed a predominantly positive effect on the grape plants adaptation to high-temperature drought and fungal diseases susceptibility, as well as essential increase of the average cluster weight and yield per hectare.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelated micronutrient fertilizer leaf treatments had a predominantly positive effect on grape adaptation to high-temperature drought and fungal disease susceptibility.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
chelated micronutrient fertilizerse1
Outcome
adaptation to high-temperature drought and fungal diseases susceptibilitye1
Direction
predominantly positive effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The new optimized scheme application on the chelated micronutrient fertilizers showed a predominantly positive effect on the grape plants adaptation to high-temperature drought and fungal diseases susceptibility, as well as essential increase of the average cluster weight and yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelated micronutrient fertilizer leaf treatments essentially increased average cluster weight and yield per hectare in grapes.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
chelated micronutrient fertilizerse1
Outcome
average cluster weight and yield per hectaree1
Direction
essential increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The new optimized scheme application on the chelated micronutrient fertilizers showed a predominantly positive effect on the grape plants adaptation to high-temperature drought and fungal diseases susceptibility, as well as essential increase of the average cluster weight and yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment reduced leaf spotting in grapes.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
the treatmente2
Outcome
leaf spottinge2
Direction
reductione2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“leaf spotting reduction due to the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fertilization · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

micronutrient · yield · VitisResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.