Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Biochar with 225 mm irrigation improved Radiation Use Efficiency (RUE) in wheat.

A claim from The Productivity of Subsequent Wheat Enhanced with Residual Carbon Sources and Phosphorus under Improved Irrigation System · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar with 225 mm irrigation improved Radiation Use Efficiency (RUE) in wheat.

Treatment
biochar with 225 mm irrigation levele1
Outcome
Radiation Use Efficiency (RUE)e2
Direction
improvese2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“biochar with 225 mm irrigation level is a suitable treatment for efficient consumption of local rainfall and increase subsequent wheat productivity under the northern climatic scenario of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1406
e2

“it improves the Evapo Transpiration (WUE), Radiation Use Efficiency (RUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1488

Title

The Productivity of Subsequent Wheat Enhanced with Residual Carbon Sources and Phosphorus under Improved Irrigation System

Imran; Amanullah; Abdel Rahman M. Al-Tawaha Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2020. doi:10.1080/00103624.2020.1763387

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-52b86a95bbcd85cc7e6161e4de823c3186ea56d9c31b8154fcf7e3039dec8834 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

biochar · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 80 positive, 5 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.