Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Broadcast lime at 1.0 LR with the 40 q ha-1 target significantly increased wheat yield.

A claim from Yield, profitability and nutrient uptake of wheat under soil test crop response based fertilizer application with different levels of lime in an acid Alfisol · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast lime at 1.0 LR with the 40 q ha-1 target significantly increased wheat yield.

Treatment
lime was applied in furrow @ 1/10 LR and by broadcast @ 1.0 LRe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and nutrient uptake by wheat was significantly increased in both treatments where lime was applied in furrow @ 1/10 LR and by broadcast @ 1.0 LR for targeted yield of 40 q ha-1 (IPNS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–837
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49

Title

Yield, profitability and nutrient uptake of wheat under soil test crop response based fertilizer application with different levels of lime in an acid Alfisol

Manpreet Singh; SP Dixit Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-55223f6564d1a5cedc8811fb396f9698496cee9bfde7ee14f75f8fa07adeebb7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Lime and PG additions had no long-term effect on wheat yield.

    Lime and phosphogypsum application and sulfate retention in subtropical soils under no-till system · 2013

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Fertilization without lime significantly decreased soil pH and crop yield relative to fertilization with lime in 2012–2018.

    Interaction of liming and long-term fertilization increased crop yield and phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) through mediating exchangeable cations in acidic soil under wheat–maize cropping system · 2020 · compared with fertilizer with lime treatments

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Liming the Al-toxic soil to pH 5.8 equalized top yields of the two wheat varieties.

    Opposite Alluminum and Manganese Tolerances of Two Wheat Varieties1 · 1973

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Liming treatments did not influence wheat yield.

    Lime and gypsum application on the wheat crop · 2002

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    At Wagga Wagga lime did not affect sensitive-line yield.

    Aluminium tolerance and lime increase wheat yield on the acidic soils of central and southern New South Wales · 2001

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Lime reduced wheat grain yield at Wongan Hills.

    The interaction between soil pH and phosphorus for wheat yield and the impact of lime-induced changes to soil aluminium and potassium · 2017

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Tillage without lime reduced wheat yield by 12% against no-till.

    Effects of applying lime and phosphogypsum in soybean and wheat nutrition · 2024 · compared with no-till

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Non-slotted plots without gypsum had reduced rates of phasic development, tillering, canopy closure and dry matter production in wheat.

    Effect of changes in moisture profiles of a transitional red-brown earth with surface and slotted gypsum applications on the development and yield of a wheat crop · 1987 · compared with non-slotted plots

    Opposite direction

164 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this claim · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    With wild mustard, broadcast nitrogen never improved wheat yields over unfertilized control.

    Fertilizer application method affects nitrogen uptake in weeds and wheat · 2002 · compared with unfertilized control

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    In the third and fourth years of the transition, yields were reduced in direct-seeded plots.

    Root Diseases of Wheat and Barley During the Transition from Conventional Tillage to Direct Seeding · 2006

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Direct drilling with retained stubble gave lower yields than the comparison treatments in a wet season.

    Tillage practices and the growth and yield of wheat in southern New South Wales: Lockhart, in a 450 mm rainfall region · 1986

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Spring broadcast of urea and AN gave negligible grain yield response in one trial.

    No‐till Winter Wheat Production on the Canadian Prairies: Placement of Urea and Ammonium Nitrate Fertilizers · 1989

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Direct drilling lowered grain yields when no fertilizer was applied.

    Effects of Direct Drilling on the Phosphorus Uptake and Fertilizer Requirements of Wheat · 1987

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Wheat yield was reduced by 23 and 16% when soybean was intercropped in the drilled and skiprow patterns, respectively.

    Intercropping Soybean into Standing Green Wheat1 · 1987 · compared with conventional

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Direct drilling reduced spring wheat grain yield by 12.8% relative to deep ploughing.

    Influence of Different Intensities of Tillage on Physiological Characteristics and Productivity of Crop-Rotation Plants · 2022 · compared with deep ploughing

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Delaying broadcast nitrogen lowered grain yield and grain-protein yield.

    No‐till Winter Wheat Production: Response to Spring Applied Nitrogen Fertilizer Form and Placement · 1991

    Opposite direction

167 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Minimum irrigation lowered average winter wheat yield by 14% versus full irrigation.

    Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.

    Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat · 1994 · compared with good quality water

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Saline irrigation caused soil salinization and reduced wheat growth and yield.

    Effect of Straw Biochar on Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Saline Water Irrigation · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Wastewater irrigation decreased plant height, leaf area and grain yield in wheat.

    Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Photosynthesis, Growth, and Anatomical Features of Two Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    An additional 33 mm of irrigation did not increase grain yield.

    Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones · 2010

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    DI water saving had no effect on wheat yield.

    Yield and water productivity of maize and wheat under deficit and raised bed irrigation practices in Egypt · 2012

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Limited irrigation yielded 99% of full irrigation for winter wheat.

    Cropping Systems for Stretching Limited Irrigation Supplies · 1993 · compared with fully irrigated

    Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.