Abstract
An investigation was carried out to study the effect of integrated nutrient management with different levels of lime under soil test crop response based fertilizer application on yield, profitability and nutrient uptake by wheat in an acid Alfisol. The experiment was conducted during rabi, 2014-15 on the research farm of CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur. The treatments comprised of general recommended dose, soil test based, target yield 30 q ha-1 (IPNS), target yield 40 q ha-1 (IPNS) with three doses of lime (0, 1/10 and 1.0 LR) designated as L0, L1 and L2 laid out in randomized block design. The results revealed that yield and nutrient uptake by wheat was significantly increased in both treatments where lime was applied in furrow @ 1/10 LR and by broadcast @ 1.0 LR for targeted yield of 40 q ha-1 (IPNS). The highest net return and B: C ratio was also found in treatment target yield of 40 q ha-1 (IPNS) with lime application @ 1/10 LR. Furthermore, the treatments based on STCR approach for target yield 30 and 40 q ha-1 with FYM under no lime recorded improvement in yield and nutrient uptake by plants as compared to soil test based and general recommended dose without FYM. The findings of present study revealed that the balanced used of chemical fertilizer in combination with lime produced highest and sustainable crop yield and its uptake of nutrients.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Furrow lime at 1/10 LR with the 40 q ha-1 target significantly increased wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- lime was applied in furrow @ 1/10 LRe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and nutrient uptake by wheat was significantly increased in both treatments where lime was applied in furrow @ 1/10 LR and by broadcast @ 1.0 LR for targeted yield of 40 q ha-1 (IPNS)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Broadcast lime at 1.0 LR with the 40 q ha-1 target significantly increased wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- lime was applied in furrow @ 1/10 LR and by broadcast @ 1.0 LRe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and nutrient uptake by wheat was significantly increased in both treatments where lime was applied in furrow @ 1/10 LR and by broadcast @ 1.0 LR for targeted yield of 40 q ha-1 (IPNS)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Lime under the 40 q ha-1 target significantly increased wheat nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- lime was applied in furrow @ 1/10 LRe0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptake by wheate0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and nutrient uptake by wheat was significantly increased in both treatments where lime was applied in furrow @ 1/10 LR and by broadcast @ 1.0 LR for targeted yield of 40 q ha-1 (IPNS)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The 40 q ha-1 target with 1/10 LR lime gave the highest net return and benefit to cost ratio.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- target yield of 40 q ha-1 (IPNS) with lime application @ 1/10 LRe0
- Outcome
- net return and B: C ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest net return and B: C ratio was also found in treatment target yield of 40 q ha-1 (IPNS) with lime application @ 1/10 LR”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The 30 and 40 q ha-1 STCR targets with FYM and no lime improved yield versus soil test and general doses without FYM.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- STCR approach for target yield 30 and 40 q ha-1 with FYM under no limee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Comparator
- soil test based and general recommended dose without FYMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatments based on STCR approach for target yield 30 and 40 q ha-1 with FYM under no lime recorded improvement in yield and nutrient uptake by plants as compared to soil test based and general recommended dose without FYM”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The 30 and 40 q ha-1 STCR targets with FYM and no lime improved nutrient uptake versus soil test and general doses without FYM.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- STCR approach for target yield 30 and 40 q ha-1 with FYM under no limee0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptake by plantse0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Comparator
- soil test based and general recommended dose without FYMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatments based on STCR approach for target yield 30 and 40 q ha-1 with FYM under no lime recorded improvement in yield and nutrient uptake by plants as compared to soil test based and general recommended dose without FYM”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Balanced fertilizer with lime was concluded to produce the highest sustainable yield and nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- chemical fertilizer in combination with limee0
- Outcome
- crop yield and its uptake of nutrientse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the balanced used of chemical fertilizer in combination with lime produced highest and sustainable crop yield and its uptake of nutrients”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
lime · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →irrigation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
169 papers more in this group
See all 173 papers →transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
172 papers more in this group
See all 176 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
955 papers more in this group
See all 959 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.