Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In the 1972 trial, pellets prepared with gum arabic adhesive and coated with Gafsaphosphate/ dolomite were as effective as commercial "triplecote" pellets in increasing white clover establishment.

A claim from CLOVER RESPONSE TO INOCULATION AND PELLETING ON TE ANAU SOILS · 1972

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 1972 trial, pellets prepared with gum arabic adhesive and coated with Gafsaphosphate/ dolomite were as effective as commercial "triplecote" pellets in increasing white clover establishment.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense1
Treatment
Gafsaphosphate/ dolomitee6
Outcome
clover establishmente6
Direction
as effectivee6
Qualifier
In the one trial conducted in 1972e6
Comparator
commercial "triplecote" pelletse6
Setting
TE ANAUt0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TE ANAU SOILS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61
e1

“establishment of white clover oversown in autumn 1971 and 1972”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–153
e6

“In the one trial conducted in 1972, pellets prepared with gum arabic adhesive and coated with lime or Gafsaphosphate/ dolomite were as effective as commercial "triplecote" pellets in increasing clover establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–725

Title

CLOVER RESPONSE TO INOCULATION AND PELLETING ON TE ANAU SOILS

W.L. Lowther; I.R. Mcdonald Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 1972. doi:10.33584/jnzg.1972.34.1341

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-55bcd85dbd2bd8bc92ee07ca96ab35594d78f01702c0d6750d4e31aac987ee0e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

lime · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.