Paper · 1985 · Grass and Forage Science

Growth responses to lime and fertilizers and critical concentrations in herbage of white clover in Scottish hill soils

ANNE RANGELEY; P. NEWBOULD

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The responses in dry matter (DM) production and changes in nutrient concentration in the shoots of white clover (cv. New Zealand Grasslands Huia) to additions of lime, N, P, K and Mg were investigated in pot and field experiments in a deep peat soil and to additions of N, P, K in two other hill soils in pot experiments. DM production and nutrient concentrations were assessed also for perennial ryegrass in the field experiment. There was no response by white clover to N, but in all soils, and in particular a deep peat, production of shoot DM was increased greatly by lime, P and K, and slightly by Mg. Interactions between lime and P and between P and K were observed. Critical concentrations of nutrients (g kg −1 ) for white clover appeared to be about 2.0 for P, 10·15 for K and 20 for Ca. Herbage production and nutrient contents of ryegrass and white clover grown on a deep peat in the field suggests that critical concentrations may possibly help to diagnose the need fur maintenance fertilizer dressings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White clover did not respond to N addition.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
no responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was no response by white clover to N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime greatly increased white clover shoot dry matter production.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
limee0
Outcome
production of shoot DMe0
Direction
increased greatlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“production of shoot DM was increased greatly by lime, P and K, and slightly by Mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P greatly increased white clover shoot dry matter production.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
production of shoot DMe0
Direction
increased greatlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“production of shoot DM was increased greatly by lime, P and K, and slightly by Mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K greatly increased white clover shoot dry matter production.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
Ke0
Outcome
production of shoot DMe0
Direction
increased greatlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“production of shoot DM was increased greatly by lime, P and K, and slightly by Mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mg slightly increased white clover shoot dry matter production.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
Mge0
Outcome
production of shoot DMe0
Direction
slightlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“production of shoot DM was increased greatly by lime, P and K, and slightly by Mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–614 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime and P interacted in their effects on clover.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
lime and Pe0
Outcome
Interactions between lime and Pe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Interactions between lime and P and between P and K were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–682 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P and K interacted in their effects on clover.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
P and Ke0
Outcome
between P and Ke0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Interactions between lime and P and between P and K were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–682 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated critical P concentration in white clover was about 2.0 g kg−1.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Outcome
Critical concentrations of nutrientse0
Value
2.0e0
Qualifier
Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Critical concentrations of nutrients (g kg −1 ) for white clover appeared to be about 2.0 for P, 10·15 for K and 20 for Ca.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–806 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated critical K concentration in white clover was about 10·15 g kg−1.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Outcome
Critical concentrations of nutrientse0
Value
10·15e0
Qualifier
Ke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Critical concentrations of nutrients (g kg −1 ) for white clover appeared to be about 2.0 for P, 10·15 for K and 20 for Ca.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–806 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated critical Ca concentration in white clover was about 20 g kg−1.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Outcome
Critical concentrations of nutrientse0
Value
20e0
Qualifier
Cae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Critical concentrations of nutrients (g kg −1 ) for white clover appeared to be about 2.0 for P, 10·15 for K and 20 for Ca.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–806 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest critical concentrations may help diagnose maintenance fertilizer needs.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Outcome
diagnose the need fur maintenance fertilizer dressingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“critical concentrations may possibly help to diagnose the need fur maintenance fertilizer dressings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1024 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lime · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

potassium · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.