Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 275 g/ha herbicide rate significantly lowered weed density and biomass against 165 g/ha and unsprayed control.

A claim from Metribuzin + clodinafop-propargyl (ready-mix) efficacy in managing weeds in wheat and assessment of its residues in the soil and wheat at harvest · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 275 g/ha herbicide rate significantly lowered weed density and biomass against 165 g/ha and unsprayed control.

Treatment
Metribuzin and clodinafop-propargyl at 275e0
Outcome
weed density and biomasse0
Direction
lowerede0
Comparator
165 g/ha and unsprayed controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metribuzin and clodinafop-propargyl at 275 and 220 g/ha significantly lowered weed density and biomass and improved wheat grain yield compared to its lowest dose of 165 g/ha and unsprayed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–827
t0

“weeds in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81

Title

Metribuzin + clodinafop-propargyl (ready-mix) efficacy in managing weeds in wheat and assessment of its residues in the soil and wheat at harvest

Pardeep Goyal; Pervinder Kaur; Makhan Singh Bhullar Indian Journal of Weed Science 2025. doi:10.5958/0974-8164.2025.00073.8

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-562f7d2fa1dcecd7e6de7b40a8c9ac84a41c4ad5694616b4000d6860378d53b7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.