Paper · 2025 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Metribuzin + clodinafop-propargyl (ready-mix) efficacy in managing weeds in wheat and assessment of its residues in the soil and wheat at harvest

Pardeep Goyal; Pervinder Kaur; Makhan Singh Bhullar

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AbstractIndiscriminate use of herbicides may raise human and animal health and environmental concerns due to residues on consumables and soil. Hence, field experiments were conducted during rabi season of 2021-22 and 2022-23 at PAU Ludhiana and KVK Sri Muktsar Sahib, Punjab, India. The objectives were to assess efficacy of metribuzin + clodinafop-propargyl (ready-mix) in managing weeds in wheat and quantify its residues retained in soil and in wheat produce. It involved spray of metribuzin and clodinafop-propargyl (ready-mix) at rates of 275, 220 and 165 g/ha along with unsprayed for weed management in surface seeded wheat. Metribuzin and clodinafop-propargyl at 275 and 220 g/ha significantly lowered weed density and biomass and improved wheat grain yield compared to its lowest dose of 165 g/ha and unsprayed control. Metribuzin and clodinafop-propargyl residues in soil and crop produce were assessed at harvest time and it was observed that their residue levels were below detectable limits (<0.01 µg/g) and below the maximum residue limit fixed by Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), indicating metribuzin + clodinafop-propargyl safety to use as an herbicide in wheat production and consumption of wheat produced after its usage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 275 g/ha herbicide rate significantly lowered weed density and biomass against 165 g/ha and unsprayed control.

Treatment
Metribuzin and clodinafop-propargyl at 275e0
Outcome
weed density and biomasse0
Direction
lowerede0
Comparator
165 g/ha and unsprayed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metribuzin and clodinafop-propargyl at 275 and 220 g/ha significantly lowered weed density and biomass and improved wheat grain yield compared to its lowest dose of 165 g/ha and unsprayed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“weeds in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 220 g/ha herbicide rate significantly lowered weed density and biomass against 165 g/ha and unsprayed control.

Treatment
220 g/hae0
Outcome
weed density and biomasse0
Direction
lowerede0
Comparator
165 g/ha and unsprayed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metribuzin and clodinafop-propargyl at 275 and 220 g/ha significantly lowered weed density and biomass and improved wheat grain yield compared to its lowest dose of 165 g/ha and unsprayed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“weeds in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 275 g/ha rate improved wheat grain yield against 165 g/ha and unsprayed control.

Treatment
Metribuzin and clodinafop-propargyl at 275e0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
165 g/ha and unsprayed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metribuzin and clodinafop-propargyl at 275 and 220 g/ha significantly lowered weed density and biomass and improved wheat grain yield compared to its lowest dose of 165 g/ha and unsprayed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 220 g/ha rate improved wheat grain yield against 165 g/ha and unsprayed control.

Treatment
220 g/hae0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
165 g/ha and unsprayed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metribuzin and clodinafop-propargyl at 275 and 220 g/ha significantly lowered weed density and biomass and improved wheat grain yield compared to its lowest dose of 165 g/ha and unsprayed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–827 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin residues at harvest were below detection and regulatory limits.

Outcome
Metribuzin and clodinafop-propargyl residues in soil and crop producee0
Direction
below detectable limitse0
Value
<0.01 µg/ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metribuzin and clodinafop-propargyl residues in soil and crop produce were assessed at harvest time and it was observed that their residue levels were below detectable limits (<0.01 µg/g) and below the maximum residue limit fixed by Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“weeds in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.