Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The FYM, mulch and kaolin practice increased lentil pods per plant significantly.

A claim from Productivity and sustainability of mustard (Brassica junceaL.) and lentil (Lens culinarisL.) intercropping system as affected by moisture conservation practices and fertility levels under rainfed conditions · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The FYM, mulch and kaolin practice increased lentil pods per plant significantly.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
farmyard manure (FYM) + organic mulch + kaolin spray (6%)t0
Outcome
numbers of pods per plante0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas in lentil it produced significantly higher numbers of pods per plant and seed weight per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–679
t0

“Moisture conservation practice farmyard manure (FYM) + organic mulch + kaolin spray (6%) produced significantly higher numbers of siliquae per plant leading to significantly higher seed yields of mustard, whereas in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–594

Title

Productivity and sustainability of mustard (Brassica junceaL.) and lentil (Lens culinarisL.) intercropping system as affected by moisture conservation practices and fertility levels under rainfed conditions

T. Singh; K. S. Rana; Yashbir Singh Shivay; et al. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2009. doi:10.1080/03650340802360476

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-56eb7e1a9728db3d2e616f73c34c56837b8df8aab6e6ce89eddae10ff75f1829 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

kaolin · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

organic · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.