Paper · 2011

Effect of Tillage, Nitrogen Fertilization and Crop Residue Management on Wheat and Lentil yield Under Three Course Rotation in Semi -Arid Region of Jordan

Bassam Snobar; Sayed Khattari; A. Battikhi; et al.

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Long term experiments (10 years) were conducted to study the effect of different tillage systems, crop residue management and nitrogen fertilization on wheat and lentil yields in three course rotation under rainfed conditions (380 mm mean annual rainfall) in Maru region , north of Jordan. Three tillage systems: moldboard followed by sweep before rain; chisel followed by sweep before rain; and only sweep after rain were commenced. Each with three residue management practices. Incorporation with soil immediately after harvesting, shortly after harvesting; and incorporating the remainder residue left after baling and grazing (traditional) .Nitrogen fertilizer at three levels (0, 20 and 30 kg ha -1 ) were used. Using moldboard followed by sweep plowing before the rain season starts gave highest average grain wheat yield (2072 kg ha -1 ), and straw yield (4465 kg ha -1 ) over nine seasons. The different ways of residue management did not significantly affect the wheat grain yield (1991 -1998 kg ha -1 ), neither the straw (3965 4214 kg ha -1 ). Combined statistical analysis for tillage – residue treatments (moldboard + sweep before rain + residue bailing then grazing followed by early or late incorporation of the remained residue) gave the highest significant average grain yield. Nitrogen fertilization rate of 30 kg N ha -1 gave highest average grain yield (2064 Kg ha -1 ) and straw yield (4239 kg ha -1 ). Highest yields (with no significant differences) of lentil grain and straw were obtained by plowing with moldboard or chisel followed by sweep before rain . Crop residue and nitrogen fertilization treatments had no significant effect on grain and straw yields. Yield of lentil grain and straw without N fertilization was as high as those with fertilization. Residual nitrogen after wheat may be adequate as starter for N fixation by lentil where there was no need for nitrogen addition .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moldboard followed by sweep plowing before the rain season gave the highest average grain wheat yield, 2072 kg/ha.

Organ / stage
graine1
Treatment
moldboard followed by sweep plowing before the rain seasone1
Outcome
average grain wheat yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2072 kg ha -1e1
Setting
Maru region , north of Jordane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long term experiments (10 years) were conducted to study the effect of different tillage systems, crop residue management and nitrogen fertilization on wheat and lentil yields in three course rotation under rainfed conditions (380 mm mean annual rainfall) in Maru region , north of Jordan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–288 · show in text ↑
e1

“Using moldboard followed by sweep plowing before the rain season starts gave highest average grain wheat yield (2072 kg ha -1 ), and straw yield (4465 kg ha -1 ) over nine seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moldboard followed by sweep plowing before the rain season gave the highest average straw yield, 4465 kg/ha.

Organ / stage
strawe1
Treatment
moldboard followed by sweep plowing before the rain seasone1
Outcome
straw yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4465 kg ha -1e1
Setting
Maru region , north of Jordane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long term experiments (10 years) were conducted to study the effect of different tillage systems, crop residue management and nitrogen fertilization on wheat and lentil yields in three course rotation under rainfed conditions (380 mm mean annual rainfall) in Maru region , north of Jordan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–288 · show in text ↑
e1

“Using moldboard followed by sweep plowing before the rain season starts gave highest average grain wheat yield (2072 kg ha -1 ), and straw yield (4465 kg ha -1 ) over nine seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Different ways of residue management did not significantly affect wheat grain yield, 1991-1998 kg/ha.

Organ / stage
graine2
Treatment
different ways of residue managemente2
Outcome
wheat grain yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Value
1991 -1998 kg ha -1e2
Setting
Maru region , north of Jordane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long term experiments (10 years) were conducted to study the effect of different tillage systems, crop residue management and nitrogen fertilization on wheat and lentil yields in three course rotation under rainfed conditions (380 mm mean annual rainfall) in Maru region , north of Jordan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–288 · show in text ↑
e2

“The different ways of residue management did not significantly affect the wheat grain yield (1991 -1998 kg ha -1 ), neither the straw (3965 4214 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Different ways of residue management did not significantly affect straw yield, 3965-4214 kg/ha.

Organ / stage
strawe2
Treatment
different ways of residue managemente2
Outcome
strawe2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Value
3965 4214 kg ha -1e2
Setting
Maru region , north of Jordane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long term experiments (10 years) were conducted to study the effect of different tillage systems, crop residue management and nitrogen fertilization on wheat and lentil yields in three course rotation under rainfed conditions (380 mm mean annual rainfall) in Maru region , north of Jordan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–288 · show in text ↑
e2

“The different ways of residue management did not significantly affect the wheat grain yield (1991 -1998 kg ha -1 ), neither the straw (3965 4214 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined analysis of tillage and residue treatments gave the highest significant average grain yield.

Organ / stage
graine3
Treatment
moldboard + sweep before rain + residue bailing then grazing followed by early or late incorporation of the remained residuee3
Outcome
average grain yielde3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long term experiments (10 years) were conducted to study the effect of different tillage systems, crop residue management and nitrogen fertilization on wheat and lentil yields in three course rotation under rainfed conditions (380 mm mean annual rainfall) in Maru region , north of Jordan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–288 · show in text ↑
e3

“Combined statistical analysis for tillage – residue treatments (moldboard + sweep before rain + residue bailing then grazing followed by early or late incorporation of the remained residue) gave the highest significant average grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization at 30 kg N/ha gave the highest average grain yield, 2064 kg/ha.

Organ / stage
graine4
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilization rate of 30 kg N ha -1e4
Outcome
average grain yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
2064 Kg ha -1e4
Setting
Maru region , north of Jordane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long term experiments (10 years) were conducted to study the effect of different tillage systems, crop residue management and nitrogen fertilization on wheat and lentil yields in three course rotation under rainfed conditions (380 mm mean annual rainfall) in Maru region , north of Jordan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–288 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrogen fertilization rate of 30 kg N ha -1 gave highest average grain yield (2064 Kg ha -1 ) and straw yield (4239 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization at 30 kg N/ha gave the highest straw yield, 4239 kg/ha.

Organ / stage
strawe4
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilization rate of 30 kg N ha -1e4
Outcome
straw yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
4239 kg ha -1e4
Setting
Maru region , north of Jordane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long term experiments (10 years) were conducted to study the effect of different tillage systems, crop residue management and nitrogen fertilization on wheat and lentil yields in three course rotation under rainfed conditions (380 mm mean annual rainfall) in Maru region , north of Jordan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–288 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrogen fertilization rate of 30 kg N ha -1 gave highest average grain yield (2064 Kg ha -1 ) and straw yield (4239 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plowing with moldboard or chisel followed by sweep before rain gave the highest lentil grain and straw yields, with no significant differences.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise5
Treatment
plowing with moldboard or chisel followed by sweep before raine5
Outcome
grain and strawe5
Direction
Higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Highest yields (with no significant differences) of lentil grain and straw were obtained by plowing with moldboard or chisel followed by sweep before rain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop residue and nitrogen fertilization treatments had no significant effect on wheat and lentil grain and straw yields.

Treatment
Crop residue and nitrogen fertilization treatmentse6
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Setting
Maru region , north of Jordane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long term experiments (10 years) were conducted to study the effect of different tillage systems, crop residue management and nitrogen fertilization on wheat and lentil yields in three course rotation under rainfed conditions (380 mm mean annual rainfall) in Maru region , north of Jordan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–288 · show in text ↑
e6

“Crop residue and nitrogen fertilization treatments had no significant effect on grain and straw yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil grain and straw yield without nitrogen fertilization was as high as with fertilization.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise7
Treatment
without N fertilizatione7
Outcome
Yield of lentil grain and strawe7
Direction
as high ase7
Comparator
those with fertilizatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Yield of lentil grain and straw without N fertilization was as high as those with fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1780 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Residual nitrogen after wheat may be adequate as starter for N fixation by lentil, so no nitrogen addition is needed.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise7
Outcome
no need for nitrogen additione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Residual nitrogen after wheat may be adequate as starter for N fixation by lentil where there was no need for nitrogen addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1909 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

37 papers: 36 positive, 1 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

grazing · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

70 papers: 34 positive, 36 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

rainfall · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

81 papers: 32 positive, 49 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 281 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.