Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Stale seedbed plus hand weeding had a 2003–2004 gross margin of Indian Rupees 109,700 per hectare.

A claim from Evaluation of mulching, stale seedbed, hand weeding and hoeing for weed control in organic garden pea (Pisum sativumsub sp. Hortens L.) · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stale seedbed plus hand weeding had a 2003–2004 gross margin of Indian Rupees 109,700 per hectare.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
stale seedbed coupled with one hand weedinge0
Outcome
gross margine0
Direction
closely followede0
Value
Indian Rupees 109,700 ha−1e0
Qualifier
2003–2004e0
Comparator
hand weeding (30 and 60 DAS)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2003–2004, hand weeding (30 and 60 DAS) recorded the highest gross margin (Indian Rupees 115,400 ha−1) closely followed by stale seedbed coupled with one hand weeding (Indian Rupees 109,700 ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1474
t0

“garden pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–101

Title

Evaluation of mulching, stale seedbed, hand weeding and hoeing for weed control in organic garden pea (Pisum sativumsub sp. Hortens L.)

K. A. Gopinath; Narendra Kumar; Banshi L. Mina; et al. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2009. doi:10.1080/03650340802287026

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-57fe31b91c5ce6ae9296d851239e4b6253bd10519561aec2f5183521295f8556 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

62 papers: 45 positive, 17 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.