Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Normal irrigation produced the highest values for all measured bread wheat growth traits, with high significance.

A claim from EFFECT OF NANO SILICA ON BREAD WHEAT UNDER WATER STRESS · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal irrigation produced the highest values for all measured bread wheat growth traits, with high significance.

Taxon
BREAD WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
normal irrigatione0
Outcome
growth traitse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Moshtohor region, Kalubia Governorate, Egypte1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“normal irrigation gave the highest values and highly significance for all growth traits under study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–938
t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–36
e1

“Two field experiments were conducted at Moshtohor region, Kalubia Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84

Title

EFFECT OF NANO SILICA ON BREAD WHEAT UNDER WATER STRESS

H. A. H. Al-Musawi; R. Khalil; S. A. S. mehasen Benha Journal of Applied Sciences 2022. doi:10.21608/bjas.2022.306490

Record rev-58dab86bbfeef61598884ce2fff0143bb2df58790d4b6263f2516e12918b51de · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.