Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Both donor and acceptor sides of PS2 were probably damaged under iron deficiency.

A claim from Changes of Donor and Acceptor Side in Photosystem 2 Complex Induced by Iron Deficiency in Attached Soybean and Maize Leaves · 2003

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both donor and acceptor sides of PS2 were probably damaged under iron deficiency.

Taxon
soybean and maizeGlycine maxZea mayse0
Treatment
iron deficiente0
Outcome
donor side but also the acceptor of PS2 was probably damagede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“not only the donor side but also the acceptor of PS2 was probably damaged in iron deficient soybean and maize leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1031

Title

Changes of Donor and Acceptor Side in Photosystem 2 Complex Induced by Iron Deficiency in Attached Soybean and Maize Leaves

Chuang-Dao Jiang; Hui-Yuan Gao; Qi Zou Photosynthetica 2003. doi:10.1023/b:phot.0000011960.95482.91

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-5c4fd6533bf80d2b90ca4d5b84cd54d02750617acf0e29d0cf909a62d542571f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

iron atom · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

iron atom · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.