Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased nitrogen uptake by grain and straw.

A claim from Effect of Vescicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Rllizobium Inoculation on Nodulation, Root Colonization, Nitrogen Fixation and Yield of Chick Pea · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased nitrogen uptake by grain and straw.

Taxon
Chick PeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Seed inoculation with Rhizobium straine0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen uptake by grain and strawe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed inoculation with Rhizobium strain significantly increased nodulation, root colonization, small grain yield, dry matter yield and nitrogen uptake by grain and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–348
t0

“Effect of Vescicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Rllizobium Inoculation on Nodulation, Root Colonization, Nitrogen Fixation and Yield of Chick Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–151

Title

Effect of Vescicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Rllizobium Inoculation on Nodulation, Root Colonization, Nitrogen Fixation and Yield of Chick Pea

Murugan Kumar; K.G. Yadav; S. K. Thakur; et al. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 1998

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-5c7bb0e35149c2b0ff55ee71b512c7dc9f8abfe2815f7662a185df745f046ffc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 57 positive, 6 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.